r5293 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches

2012-06-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2012-06-24 10:51:21 + (Sun, 24 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5293 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series.hurd-i386 Log: Comment the hurd-only mremap patch for now Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog =

r5294 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/hurd-i386

2012-06-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2012-06-24 12:41:45 + (Sun, 24 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5294 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hurd-i386/unsubmitted-mremap.diff glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series.hurd-i386 Log: Fix and re-enable hurd-only

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #24 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-06-24 15:03:10 UTC --- On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, carlos_odonell at mentor dot com wrote: > > Based on experience from the sinking feeling of watching target milestones > > slowly march forward

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-24 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #25 from Rich Felker 2012-06-24 21:44:37 UTC --- When a bug has been known for over 4 years and there's such a simple fix, why is there discussion of putting off fixing it until later? Or am I misunderstanding Jonathan's reply again

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-24 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #26 from Carlos O'Donell 2012-06-24 22:03:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > When a bug has been known for over 4 years and there's such a simple fix, why > is there discussion of putting off fixing it until later? Or am I > mis