Aurelien,
thanks for informing us.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future,
> which might have some side effects.
What kind of side effects might happen? I.e. is it likely to break pure armhf
systems
Author: aurel32
Date: 2012-07-04 22:08:02 + (Wed, 04 Jul 2012)
New Revision: 5301
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
* patches/arm/unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff: disable, as it will
conflict with upstream x32 support
Hi,
At the end of last year the patch unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff
has been added, but has not been submitted upstream despite asking a few
times. This patch provides correct ldconfig support for systems with
both armel and armhf libraries.
The situation is now that this patch breaks MIPS
Author: aurel32
Date: 2012-07-04 21:27:11 + (Wed, 04 Jul 2012)
New Revision: 5300
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/arm/unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff
Log:
* patches/arm/unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff: fix MIPS n64 support
b
Hello Pablo,
according to [1] both e-mail addresses are more recent ones from the
former pa...@mandrakesoft.com, pa...@mandriva.com. If that is not the
case please accept my apologizes (and maybe you know the correct
current contact details in that case?).
You are listed as contact person/author o
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 07:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678358: fixed in netifaces 0.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678358,
regarding hurd should not define AF_LINK .
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
