Processed: tagging 627243

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 627243 + upstream Bug #627243 [eglibc] eglibc: RES_OPTIONS cannot disabled options enabled in /etc/resolv.conf. Added tag(s) upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 627243:

Bug#692136: libc6: debugging resolv by setting debug does not work

Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-36 Severity: minor Dear Maintainers, Debugging name resulution does not work. According to 'man resolv.conf', it can be enabled by writing options debug in /etc/resolv.conf or by setting RES_OPTIONS=debug when starting a process. I tried to debug problems in dns

Bug#608061: libc6: dns-lookup unusable in mixed ipv4/ipv6-networks

related bug: #582916 but i think the problem only happens if the response for the A record is lost or maybe arrives after the response for the record -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Processed: Re: libc6: dns-lookup unusable in mixed ipv4/ipv6-networks

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 608061 http://sourceware.org/PR12994 Bug #608061 [libc6] libc6: dns-lookup unusable in mixed ipv4/ipv6-networks Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://sourceware.org/PR12994'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?

Package: libc6-i686 Version: 2.13-35 Severity: normal Package description mentions 2.6 kernels. These days, Debian also have 3.2 kernels. Shouldn't the description mention those kernels too? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#692154: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?

severity 692154 minor tags 692154 + patch quit Regid Ichira wrote: Package description mentions 2.6 kernels. These days, Debian also have 3.2 kernels. Shouldn't the description mention those kernels too? How about this patch? Thanks, Jonathan Index: changelog

Processed: Re: Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 692154 minor Bug #692154 [libc6-i686] Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels? Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' tags 692154 + patch Bug #692154 [libc6-i686] Shouldn't description mention also 3.2 kernels? Added tag(s) patch.