On 07/30/2009 09:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Thanks for this patch I have tried it, and it does not have the original
problem I have reported. Unfortunately it does not pass the glibc
testsuite. I'll try to debug the problem later (I don't own an alpha
machine, and need to have internet access t
On 07/26/2009 04:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Knowing that $31 could be used for prefetch, I have modified the
assembly code from memchr.S to use it. It passes all the testsuite.
This isn't intended to be a prefetch instruction, it's
meant to be fetching the data for the next word. I.e.
we've
On 07/13/2009 03:16 PM, Matt Turner forwarded:
The problem is that the memchr() function on alpha uses prefetch, which
can cause a page boundary to be crossed, while the standards (POSIX and
C99) says it should stop when a match is found.
That's not supposed to matter -- faults from prefetch ar
Brennan,(
Save 95% for all Viagra/Cialis/Levitra.
http://www.ERECTION-FOUND.BIZ/ES001/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=404
chassis,some reason felt.
Brennan,(
Save 95% for all Viagra/Cialis/Levitra.
http://www.ERECTION-FOUND.BIZ/ES001/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=404
chassis,some reason felt.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:08:06AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On the other side, Alpha is not the only arch which want long double
> and changing SONAME is really painful.
I was noticing this.
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-08/msg00102.html
> was my initial attempt to handle
So I'm thinking that I'd like to finally get around to changing to
128-bit long double for alpha-linux. I'm undecided how to go about
doing this though.
The math routines would be easy to version, but things like printf
definitely aren't. Because of that, I was thinking that perhaps
it might be
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:13:33PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Richard, do we need your recent patches to glibc to make this worthwhile?
> Our snapshot is from September or so.
No. All of this is quite old. The only thing that's new is the
kernel patch, and that 3-liner is only cause I never not
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:13:33PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Richard, do we need your recent patches to glibc to make this worthwhile?
> Our snapshot is from September or so.
No. All of this is quite old. The only thing that's new is the
kernel patch, and that 3-liner is only cause I never not
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: wishlist
Beginning with versions 2.6.2 and 2.4.25, the kernel will emit
AT_PLATFORM data for ev56, ev6, ev67. This would allow optional
system-specific libraries in /lib/$platform/ as for other targets.
EV67 is most interesting because libc has sp
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: wishlist
Beginning with versions 2.6.2 and 2.4.25, the kernel will emit
AT_PLATFORM data for ev56, ev6, ev67. This would allow optional
system-specific libraries in /lib/$platform/ as for other targets.
EV67 is most interesting because libc has sp
11 matches
Mail list logo
