)
A closer look reveals that stock FreeBSD 10.x does define this symbol,
so presumably kernel support is available but the installed headers
are too old to reflect it.
Could you please take a look?
Thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu
Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> writes:
> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/local_lim.h:#define HOST_NAME_MAX 64
I just took a closer look and noticed the "-linux-" in this path. This
is not a header I would expect kFreeBSD builds to use.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at
, or whether the change was
even intentional; copying debian-glibc for clarification.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
workaround could be to follow gtk+-2.0's lead: keep the
actual binaries in the lib package, but place them under /usr/lib and
have the bin package just ship symlinks to them.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi
for that to carry much weight.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be a configuration error.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be a configuration error.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
that before 2.3.1 was
uploaded.
Oh, well; it *is* called unstable for a reason... ;-)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
always (rightly) placed a lot of
value on infrastructure AFAICT.
Thoughts? (Obviously this is too late to use for 2.2 - 2.3, but it
should be possible to complete the transition in plenty of time for
whatever follows it [2.4? 3.0?].)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org
on services that need
to be added to the list.
Fair enough.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
that before 2.3.1 was
uploaded.
Oh, well; it *is* called unstable for a reason... ;-)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
on services that need
to be added to the list.
Fair enough.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
The call to dpkg --compare-versions in libc's postinst should compare
against a higher version than 2.1.95-1; after upgrading to 2.3.1-1, I
found that a lot of services (including in particular inetd and kdm)
didn't work right until I
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
The call to dpkg --compare-versions in libc's postinst should compare
against a higher version than 2.1.95-1; after upgrading to 2.3.1-1, I
found that a lot of services (including in particular inetd and kdm)
didn't work right until I
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-14
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The m68k version of bits/mman.h fails to define the MADV_*
constants, even though they are present in asm-m68k/mman.h in the
kernel sources (as of 2.4.19, at any rate). I acknowledge that the
issue is not hard to work around,
15 matches
Mail list logo
