Re: Multiarch support (was Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 on amd64)

2006-02-23 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I still have to find how to do that cleanly in the debhelper files). Bdale, do you agree

Re: Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 on amd64

2006-02-22 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port compliant with the FHS, which is almost impossible given the current setup, ie 64-bit libraries in /lib. However, it would make it compliant with the part of the FHS

Re: Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 on amd64

2006-02-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: If there's consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward. My sense is that the concensus that exists is around FHS compliance. While I personally consider

Re: 2.3.1-6

2002-12-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Bailey) writes: I would like to hear from some other arch's about how -6 is working for them. My build of your updated -6 sources on ia64 completed successfully. For what it's worth, these were the start and end times of the pbuilder run on an HP rx2600 dual 900Mhz

subscribe

2002-03-18 Thread Bdale Garbee

Bug#54172: LOG_NTP facility for syslog()?

2000-01-06 Thread Bdale Garbee
Package: libc6-dev Severity: wishlist It would really be nice to have a LOG_NTP facility defined for syslog(). I don't know what it would take to get this included in libc6 and properly handled by the syslogd we ship with Debian, but it exists on other OS's, and ntpd output would be nice to be