Bug#300943: test with glibc 2.3.4-1 (experimental)

2005-03-23 Thread Daniele Cruciani
tested code found here: http://ubuntu.uni-klu.ac.at/UbuntuGlibcHoary no error, tested with gcc-3.3 and gcc-4.0 (experimental) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Short question(s)

2005-03-01 Thread Daniele Cruciani
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:04:09AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:50:48 +0100, Daniele Cruciani wrote: I do want to build glibc setting kernel minimal version to 2.4.0 (2.4.22 .. does matter last digit??), and compile it with flags for my machine (PIII). (I

Short question(s)

2005-02-24 Thread Daniele Cruciani
Hi, I do want to build glibc setting kernel minimal version to 2.4.0 (2.4.22 .. does matter last digit??), and compile it with flags for my machine (PIII). (I actually use kernel 2.6.10) Will I fall in any trouble? Does anyone do it in Debian (set min kernel to 2.4.0)? Daniele. -- To

Bug#171551: libc6: package do not compile

2002-12-06 Thread Daniele Cruciani
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:48:56AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 03:50, Daniele Cruciani wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 Severity: normal It stop here: mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/config' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x) make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr