On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:01:10PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 14, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > This seems to be same as #953562 which was reported in March.
> Why do you think that this is the same?
The symptoms seem identical, at least. Maybe there is more than
Control: reassign -1 libcrypt1
Control: forcemerge -1 953562
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 08:48:19PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-11-13 18:23 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> > Control: reassign -1 perl-base
> > Control: affects -1 upgrade-reports
> > Control: severity -1 grave
> >
> > Hi Perl
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 05:01:27PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 02:38:40PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > Now that we have glibc 2.26 in experimental, can I ask about the status
> > of this issue? Do we have to add Breaks: against the affected perl
> > packages?
>
> Thank
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:27:26AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: perl
> > Version: 5.26.0-8
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, vor...@debian.org, gl...@packages.debian.org
> >
> > As seen in
> > https://bugs.
try
> >to let upstream know. Thanks!
>
>
> IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in "Message #54" [1]
> still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be
> problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile.
>
> Petr
>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:16:24AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 29/05/12 18:00, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 08:00:48PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On 27/05/12 17:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> I just checked to see
711), I just didn't notice the other commit
> in pkg-glibc SVN. Thanks Petr!
Thanks - I'd appreciate a heads-up when the updated package is
available for test in sid.
Cheers,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver
7 matches
Mail list logo