Bug#327025: Finnish calendar still formated erroneously

2005-11-14 Thread Graham Wilson
blocks 288472 + 327025 thanks On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:23:35PM +0300, Petri T. Koistinen wrote: > Finnish calendar still formated erroneously, but glibc support should be > in place. glibc still reports Saturday as the first day for the C locale, which is why I don't have the support enabled in

Bug#327025: C locale has bad default for _NL_TIME_FIRST_WEEKDAY

2005-09-07 Thread Graham Wilson
reassign 327025 libc6 thanks On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:15:38PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:18:42AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > > The _NL_TIME_FIRST_WEEKDAY symbol, when passed to nl_langinfo, is > > supposed to give the first day of the week. Thi

Bug#327025: C locale has bad default for _NL_TIME_FIRST_WEEKDAY

2005-09-06 Thread Graham Wilson
Package: locales Version: 2.3.5-6 Severity: normal The _NL_TIME_FIRST_WEEKDAY symbol, when passed to nl_langinfo, is supposed to give the first day of the week. This seems to work correctly for most locales. However, the results for the POSIX locale seem odd. I think it would make more sense for P

Bug#181493: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-11-07 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:13:24AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > I'd recommend that the glibc close/reopen war in question be handled > better from now on. Anthony did say "contact the upstream copyright > holder", and I think it would be a *very good idea* for somebody to do > that instead of furth

Bug#181493: Regaining Access to the Control Bot

2003-11-07 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:13:24AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > I'd recommend that the glibc close/reopen war in question be handled > better from now on. Anthony did say "contact the upstream copyright > holder", and I think it would be a *very good idea* for somebody to do > that instead of furth

Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version

2003-10-21 Thread Graham Wilson
[please CC me as I'm not subscribed.] On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc > whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn't build yet (hi Carlos); i386, > PowerPC, and S/390 will be in the archi

Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version

2003-10-21 Thread Graham Wilson
[please CC me as I'm not subscribed.] On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc > whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn't build yet (hi Carlos); i386, > PowerPC, and S/390 will be in the archi

Bug#200833: more information about the bug

2003-07-11 Thread Graham Wilson
the problem stated by this bug is that the maintainer scripts fail with a segmentation fault. the scripts segfault since bash segfaults, and the scripts start with #!/bin/bash. changing the shebang line to sh instead of bash (sh on my system is dash). i also downloaded a copy of the -17 libc6, unp

Bug#200833: more information about the bug

2003-07-11 Thread Graham Wilson
the problem stated by this bug is that the maintainer scripts fail with a segmentation fault. the scripts segfault since bash segfaults, and the scripts start with #!/bin/bash. changing the shebang line to sh instead of bash (sh on my system is dash). i also downloaded a copy of the -17 libc6, unp