Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: linux/types.h conflicts with sys/ustat.h

2007-06-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc_2.3.6-7_i386.changes REJECTED

2006-04-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:03:31AM -0700, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Hi maintainers, Sorry, but I'm going to reject this package. 1) You're adding a new package directly to unstable, instead of first

Bug#271650: FTBFS: illuminator/arm -- shlibs error

2004-09-16 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
, it might propagate to testing, and lacking this luck in the future, it might be impossible to do security support for it. Build failures are always a problem of the failing package (in addition to the problem-causer, of course), however annoying that might be. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL

Bug#252284: Exits (does not reload) on HUP

2004-06-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
be made a synonym for 'restart'. No, reload should not be supported then, and force-reload (defined as 'reload if supported, restart otherwise') should behave as defined. See policy 9.3.2. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A

Bug#252284: Exits (does not reload) on HUP

2004-06-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
be made a synonym for 'restart'. No, reload should not be supported then, and force-reload (defined as 'reload if supported, restart otherwise') should behave as defined. See policy 9.3.2. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A

Bug#247241: FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary'

2004-05-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:08:09AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Tue, 4 May 2004 18:44:58 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:36:07PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: According to chapter 4.8 of Policy The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user

Bug#247241: FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary'

2004-05-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:08:09AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Tue, 4 May 2004 18:44:58 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:36:07PM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: According to chapter 4.8 of Policy The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user

Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...

2004-05-05 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:07:08AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 06:25:20PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: retitle 221982 Please put nss modules in /lib/nss/ (or something like that) severity 221982 wishlist reassign 221982 glibc thanks Please keep

Re: Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...

2004-05-04 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
retitle 221982 Please put nss modules in /lib/nss/ (or something like that) severity 221982 wishlist reassign 221982 glibc thanks Please keep myself in the Cc list. On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote

Bug#247241: FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary'

2004-05-04 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
-- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...

2004-05-04 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
retitle 221982 Please put nss modules in /lib/nss/ (or something like that) severity 221982 wishlist reassign 221982 glibc thanks Please keep myself in the Cc list. On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote

Bug#247241: FTBFS: no rule to make target build_tree when running 'debian/rules binary'

2004-05-04 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
-- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...

2004-04-21 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
of this misplacement on every lintian run. Feel free to discuss this bug with [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you like. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...

2004-04-21 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
of this misplacement on every lintian run. Feel free to discuss this bug with [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you like. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#242546: libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements

2004-04-12 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:08:21AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: The package description says: | This package includes support for NPTL. The optimized libraries will | not be used unless you are using a 2.6 kernel

Bug#242546: libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements

2004-04-12 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 12:08:21AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: The package description says: | This package includes support for NPTL. The optimized libraries will | not be used unless you are using a 2.6 kernel

Bug#242546: libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements

2004-04-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]