Bug#365537: libc6-i686: malloc() corruption messages should print PID and path to executable

2006-04-30 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6-i686 Version: 2.3.6-7 Severity: wishlist Since today my testing installation won't start X anymore. I realize this most probably is *not* glibc's fault. At virtual console 7 I get: " *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x084af780 *** " Unforturnately tha

Bug#287824: libc6: fseek() fails and returns -1 without setting errno

2005-01-13 Thread Johan Walles
t; Why would the actual file position affect the return value from fseek()? Especially without being a bug (possibly in the man page, but still)? Regards //Johan -Original Message- From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Bug#287824: libc6: fseek() fails and returns -1 without setting errno

2004-12-30 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18 Severity: normal The output of the following program is: " [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/test$ ./a.out fseek: Unknown error 12345 " Since I set errno to 12345 before making the (failing) fseek() call, fseek() itself apparently fails without setting errno. Here's t

Bug#215260: /usr/include/math.h: No prototype for roundf()

2003-10-11 Thread Johan Walles
close 215260 thanks On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 17:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Try using -D_GNU_SOURCE and then see if it's there. Or > -D_ISOC99_SOURCE, or gcc -std=c99. _ISOC99_SOURCE did the trick. Thanks! Cheers //Johan

Bug#215260: /usr/include/math.h: No prototype for roundf()

2003-10-11 Thread Johan Walles
close 215260 thanks On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 17:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Try using -D_GNU_SOURCE and then see if it's there. Or > -D_ISOC99_SOURCE, or gcc -std=c99. _ISOC99_SOURCE did the trick. Thanks! Cheers //Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Bug#215260: /usr/include/math.h: No prototype for roundf()

2003-10-11 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/math.h libm.so.6 has a roundf() function: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nm -D /lib/libm.so.6|grep roundf 00013180 W llroundf 000130e0 W lroundf 00011630 W roundf It is documented on the roundf(3) man page: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg

Bug#215260: /usr/include/math.h: No prototype for roundf()

2003-10-11 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/math.h libm.so.6 has a roundf() function: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nm -D /lib/libm.so.6|grep roundf 00013180 W llroundf 000130e0 W lroundf 00011630 W roundf It is documented on the roundf(3) man page: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg

Bug#202835: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so: Want i686 optimized build

2003-07-30 Thread Johan Walles
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 16:49, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:39:34PM +0200, Johan Walles wrote: > > > I would like to have an i686 optimized glibc package. The reason is > > glibc is what is taking up the most time (23%) during my boot > > sequence: &g

Bug#202835: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so: Want i686 optimized build

2003-07-30 Thread Johan Walles
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 16:49, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:39:34PM +0200, Johan Walles wrote: > > > I would like to have an i686 optimized glibc package. The reason is > > glibc is what is taking up the most time (23%) during my boot > > sequence: &g

Bug#202835: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so: Want i686 optimized build

2003-07-25 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-16 Severity: wishlist File: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so I would like to have an i686 optimized glibc package. The reason is glibc is what is taking up the most time (23%) during my boot sequence: 2094 2.6173 0. /bin/bash 2500 3.1248 0. /usr/X11R6/bin/

Bug#202835: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so: Want i686 optimized build

2003-07-25 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-16 Severity: wishlist File: /lib/libc-2.3.1.so I would like to have an i686 optimized glibc package. The reason is glibc is what is taking up the most time (23%) during my boot sequence: 2094 2.6173 0. /bin/bash 2500 3.1248 0. /usr/X11R6/bin/

Bug#159411: Cannot reproduce

2003-01-27 Thread Johan Walles
H. S. Teoh wrote: Could this be an architecture-specific problem? I'm on an i386 FYI. Yes, this is IA64 specific. //Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: Re: Bug 171659 is holding back most of testing

2003-01-19 Thread Johan Walles
First of all, my insights in glibc development and RPC are close to none, so if the below is stupid, please be nice :-). sön 2003-01-19 klockan 18.46 skrev Jeff Bailey: > 171659 is not holding back testing. I've spoken with both bdale and aj > to let them know that I'm working with upstream on fi

Fwd: Re: Bug 171659 is holding back most of testing

2003-01-19 Thread Johan Walles
-Vidarebefordrat meddelande- From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug 171659 is holding back most of testing Date: 19 Jan 2003 12:41:57 +0100 Johan Walles wrote: > sön 2003-01-19 klockan 11.05 skrev Martin Schulze: &

Bug#159411: libc6.1-dev: Stack size constants are way off

2002-09-03 Thread Johan Walles
Package: libc6.1-dev Version: 2.2.5-6 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/bits/sigstack.h johan@reed:~/src/test$ grep SIGSTKSZ /usr/include/ -r /usr/include/bits/sigstack.h:#define MINSIGSTKSZ2048 /usr/include/bits/sigstack.h:#define SIGSTKSZ 8192 /usr/include/asm/signal.h:#define MINSI