On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:27:45PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libc6-x32,libc6-i386
> Version: 2.28-8
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts in a --merged-usr environment I noticed that
> installing, removi
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:58:47PM +0200, Roman Savochenko wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.24
> Severity: critical
>
This is not a critical bug (it's not even clear from the report at this
point what the problem is, and it doesn't seem too widespread);
downgrad
On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request
> that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and
> update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures.
>
Everyone, please avoi
VM
>>support uncertain. (DSA)
>>- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
>>
>> [DSA Sprint report]:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/02/msg4.html
>
> In this report Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> In short, the hardware (development boards) we'
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 14:22:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Unfortunately it didn't make in 9.3 due to the regression introduced wrt
> /etc/ld.so.nohwcap (see bug#883394). The issue is due to the conversion
> of libc6-i686 into a transitional package between jessie a
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for
Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into
wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 16:44:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2013-10-02 16:14, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:23:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>
> >>That looks okay. In terms of the other suggested updates, as a
> >>non-release architecture for wheezy, hurd-specifi
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:43:48 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Both wheezy kernels (8.3 and 9.0) do support O_CLOEXEC.
> Together with enabling O_CLOEXEC we have to
> at least raise minimal kernel version to 8.3 in
>
> debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst
> debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd.mk
>
tag 555168 wheezy-ignore
kthxbye
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 15:25:10 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> I've been asked to ask you whether you consider bug#555168 (many glibc
> locale files having a license that does not permit modification) to be
> something deserving a wheezy-ig
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 21:17:35 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: tzdata
>
> Hi,
>
> I've read today that upstream has taken down the source because
> of a law suite against them. From what I understand they have
> based some of their historic information on the ACS American
> Atlas. Upstr
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 22:53:15 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it
> is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more
> testing of the current SVN on more machines, and everything seems fine
> around the rel
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 600667 squeeze-can-defer
tag 600667 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 21:19:53 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> reopen 600667
> thanks
>
> Maybe I'm reading things wrong, or maybe Mitre's information is
> actually incorrect, but it
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 610749 squeeze-can-defer
tag 610749 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:10:35 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Even if testing is not affected, it's a serious problem as packages are
> in unstable before moving to testing. This is wa
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 21:35:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I would like to make an upload of eglibc to address DSA-2122-2 (the
> first round of patches for the $ORIGIN/LD_AUDIT issue does not cover
> all corner cases, unfortunately). The changes match those in
> 2.7-18lenny7, which are based
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:57:05 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 11:44:56 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > This will only be done with the approval of the release team, who
> > I've copied in.
> >
> I don't think that's not g
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 11:44:56 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> This will only be done with the approval of the release team, who
> I've copied in.
>
I don't think that's not going to happen. Try again for wheezy, and
maybe you can manage not to wait until the last minute of the freeze.
Cheers,
Ju
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 20:14:12 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> This is still broken (a bug in libc6). reassign
>
For what it's worth, I can't reproduce this. Both 'xterm -e su' and
'uxterm -e su' ask for a password and then exit (not that I know why
you'd run that command, but.).
Cheers,
Julie
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 22:28:23 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> And also, under zsh:
> | $ which doublefailure 2>/dev/null
> | doublefailure not found
>
> Leading to:
> | if [ -x `which icanhazfailure 2>/dev/null` ] ; then echo FAIL ; fi
> | [: too many arguments
>
Why would you point /bin/s
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 14:24:57 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Given it's a dpkg bug and not a bug in eglibc, I think this should be
> handled by binNMU. Could the release team please schedule them? Thanks
> in advance.
>
As already mentioned, the issue with binNMUs here is they don't ensure
the
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 19:39:51 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.9-13
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
> system after pur
reassign 521439 libc6 2.9-6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 519545 libc6 2.9-4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: important
$ getent ahosts ftp.fi.debian.org.
130.230.54.99 DGRAM ftp.fi.debian.org
130.230.54.99 RAW
2001:708:310:54::99 STREAM
2001:708:310:54::99 DGRAM
2001:708:310:54::99 RAW
130.230.54.99 STREAM
The 3 INET6 addresses should come first
reassign 432330 lib32z1
forcemerge 432262 432330
kthxbye
On Mon, Jul 9, 2007 at 23:25:07 +1000, Lukian wrote:
> Unpacking replacement libc6-i386 ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in pa
reassign 432326 lib32z1
forcemerge 432262 432326
kthxbye
On Mon, Jul 9, 2007 at 14:34:16 +0200, Noel Köthe wrote:
> Unpacking replacement libc6-i386 ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also i
On Wed, May 9, 2007 at 11:33:36 -0400, Greg Alexander wrote:
> My mistake! I forgot that I was using Windows!
>
> I will never again forget that newer = better and works = wrong, thank
> you for the thorough schooling.
>
if newer != better, and you want to use older, then why not use sarge or
-gcc from the
Mail-Followup-To.
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
utils 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 and libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-5.
Does anyone know of an alpha-related change in the toolchain between
these versions, which could have caused this?
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a meaningful backtrace with gdb (I
only know that the segfault occurs at program startup).
Than
29 matches
Mail list logo
