Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2005-02-27 Thread Lee Revell
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 17:04 +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote (August 21, 2004 - half a year ago): > > > > > > If not now, then when do you expect this to be in unstable? > > > > > > > > Personal judgement: With about 90% probability after the first release > > > > of > > >

Bug#266507: libc6: one-liner fix

2004-08-19 Thread Lee Revell
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-16 Followup-For: Bug #266507 Here is the fix: --- nptl/pthread_create.c~ 2003-09-09 03:17:15.0 -0400 +++ nptl/pthread_create.c 2004-08-17 21:48:47.0 -0400 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ /* Determine scheduling parameters for the thread. XXX Ho

Bug#266507: NPTL (0.60) quirks with pthread_create (ignores attributes)

2004-08-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 05:32, Florian Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:44:05 +0900 > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At Wed, 18 Aug 2004 04:51:59 +0200, > > Florian Schmidt wrote: > > > there's a problem with the libc6 package and a 2.6.x kernel. I have > > > attached two test

Bug#266507: patch fixes the problem

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
Several people on the jackit-devel list who tried Robert Jordens' .debs report that this patch fixes the problem, with no ill effects. Please apply ASAP. Lee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 10:03, Robert Jordens wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:41:26 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:35, Robert Jordens wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> [Fri, 20 Aug 2004] Lee Revell wrote: > >> > OK, great. Any

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 16:55, Florian Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:28:24 -0400 > Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Argh, they will not even fix it in unstable? What is the point of > > having an unstable distribution?!?. Can we at leas

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 16:59, Paul Davis wrote: > >> > MONTHS were spent tracking this bug down. It is an insult to the > >> > Linux audio community for Debian to refuse to fix this. > > i think this is a bit of an overstatement. > Yeah I actually meant to snip those two lines. Oops. I retract

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 19:29, Martijn Sipkema wrote: > [...] > > so there *is* a workaround for the bug. and i personally believe that > > JACK, at least, should be using the workaround. > > It's a pretty serious bug though, in that very basic functionality doesn't > not work correctly, and I perso

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 19:41, Daniel Schmitt wrote: > On Saturday 21 August 2004 00:36, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 19:29, Martijn Sipkema wrote: > > > > > > It's a pretty serious bug though, in that very basic functionality > > > doe

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-20 Thread Lee Revell
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 21:11, Robert Jordens wrote: > [witten after a few beers and a birthday party at 3 am, so please excuse > misleading wording] > > Hello! > > [Fri, 20 Aug 2004] Lee Revell wrote: > > Argh, they will not even fix it in unstable? What is the point o

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: Re: little NPTL SCHED_FIFO test program

2004-08-21 Thread Lee Revell
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 10:36, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:17:37PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 21:11, Robert Jordens wrote: > > > [witten after a few beers and a birthday party at 3 am, so please excuse > > > misleading