Bug#351629: Still in 2.3.6.ds1-10 with sarge binutils

2007-03-07 Thread Michael Koren
Is there a reasonable way to use an older libc6-dev with a current libc6? I wouldn't mind using the version from sarge when I want to use gcc-3.3, but the dependencies don't allow it. As I asked before, is there a good reason for that (seeing as libstdc++6-dev doesn't have that restriction), or wo

Bug#351629: Still in 2.3.6.ds1-10 with sarge binutils

2007-03-04 Thread Michael Koren
>> Hi, I don't know if I can reopen this as a normal user, but I can >> still reproduce this with libc6-dev from etch and binutils from sarge, > > that's an unsupported mix. there is a gcc-3.3 in etch, binutils in >etch, please install this combination. I was referring to the problem described by

Bug#351629: Still in 2.3.6.ds1-10 with sarge binutils

2007-03-01 Thread Michael Koren
Hi, I don't know if I can reopen this as a normal user, but I can still reproduce this with libc6-dev from etch and binutils from sarge, as the initial report stated. Unless the conflict between newer binutils and g++-3.3 has been fixed, that would seem to still leave a problem. I'm using the o