On 24 Oct 2022 13:12, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> * Samuel Thibault:
> > Florian Weimer, le lun. 24 oct. 2022 12:11:03 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> * Samuel Thibault:
> >>
> >> > Is it not possible to make -static -pie get the same behavior? That'd be
> >> > way more orthogonal for people to un
On 28 Jul 2016 15:15, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 05:30 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > would it be so terrible to properly marshall this data ?
>
> Ximin Luo and I discussed this and I wonder if it is possible to read
> out the libc.so.6 build ID if it is present. It
On Monday 27 August 2012 08:28:50 Tomas Dohnalek wrote:
> I guess, that you are having the same difficulties so I want to ask, how
> do you deal with current state? Have you made any internal tool for
> comparing results or are you doing it manually?
i run `make -k >& log` then grep it for the Err
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 11:50:27 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Aurelien Jarno
wrote:
> >> Frans Pop a écrit :
> >>> Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > In practice it shouldn't be problem at all.
> > Debian should make sure that binary/li
On Sunday 24 May 2009 07:44:40 Petr Baudis wrote:
> I'm full-quoting the mail. Summary of previous discussion: Me and
> Roland agree that (up to exceptions) only cherry-picked commits from
> master will appear on the branch, they will be only bugfixes and API/ABI
> will never be changed. What w
On Friday 20 March 2009 15:58:15 Shameem Ahamed wrote:
> Is there any glibc supported system call or library function which returns
> the kernel details ( specifically the architecture, whether it is a 32 bit
> or 64 bit). I was thinking that sysconf system call supports it. But i
> checked the m
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 01:18:15 Shameem Ahamed wrote:
> I am not able to compile my program, as i can't find
> the getxattr, setxattr family of system calls. I checked the header
> files folder and couldn't find the attr folder also.
they arent provided by glibc. install the attr/acl packages.
ive moved this report upstream as it happens on Gentoo as well:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9689
-mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thursday 22 February 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > All statically initialized locks are broken. We made locks smaller,
> > and changed the value of the static initialization.
>
> Smaller? Smaller is easy. And you didn't actually reduce
> __SIZEOF_PTHREAD_MUTEX_T, did you? This seems like it
On Sunday 18 February 2007, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> NPTL for hppa-linux is not backwards compatible with Linuxthreads, we
> have broken the pthread ABI.
>
> It has been recommended that we bump to libc6.1 for NPTL. Is that a
> good idea? Are there any comments about how to make such a transition
10 matches
Mail list logo
