Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11

Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could you check to see whether the libraries has dramatically changed size? If you can check that, there's a chance we can make sure it's fixed for -13. It looks like this when upgrading from 2.3.2.ds1-11: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l

Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11

Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could you check to see whether the libraries has dramatically changed size? If you can check that, there's a chance we can make sure it's fixed for -13. It looks like this when upgrading from 2.3.2.ds1-11: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l

Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11

Package: libc6.1 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: normal Changelog does not explain why previous version was 15 MB and current version is 50 MB. Is it not stripped for some reason? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#248373: libc6.1: 2.3.2.ds1-12 on Alpha takes much more disk space than 2.3.2.ds1-11

Package: libc6.1 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11 Severity: normal Changelog does not explain why previous version was 15 MB and current version is 50 MB. Is it not stripped for some reason? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),