Hi Florian,
> * Petr Vorel:
> >> nss_compat no longer depends on libnsl in current glibc. It can be used
> >> without NIS, and some users do that. I don't think your patch changes
> >> this.
> > Interesting. I guess adding this would be worth the
Sun RPC, e.g. on --enable-obsolete-rpc (installed
libnsl headers use installed Sun RPC headers), which will be removed in
the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
changes v4->v5:
* update manual/nsswitch.texi and nss/nsswitch.conf
* mention that libnss_compat does not depended on li
Hi,
changes v4->v5:
* update manual/nsswitch.texi and nss/nsswitch.conf
* mention that libnss_compat does not depended on libnsl since 2.27 and
thus can be used without NIS
* wrap NEWS with column 72
Kind regards,
Petr
Petr Vorel (2):
Remove --enable-obsolete-nsl
Remove --enable-obsol
Hi Florian,
> * Petr Vorel:
> > thank you for your review. I'll have time to send next version in second
> > half of July.
> If we merge new ports for glibc 2.32, it would be nice not include
> sunrpc in them. We'll figure something out.
+1. I'l
Hi Florian,
thank you for your review. I'll have time to send next version in second
half of July.
> * Petr Vorel:
> > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> > index a660fc59a8..cfaf50c816 100644
> > --- a/NEWS
> > +++ b/NEWS
> > @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ Major new features:
Hi Szabolcs,
...
> > +* Remove configure option --enable-obsolete-nsl. libnsl is only built as
> > shared
> > + library for backward compatibility and the NSS modules libnss_compat,
> > + libnss_nis and libnss_nisplus are not built at all, libnsl's headers
> > aren't
> > + installed. This com
will be
removed in following commit.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
INSTALL | 9 ---
NEWS | 8 ++
config.h.in | 4 ---
config.make.in | 1 -
configure| 20 +-
configure.ac
I've tested only default compilation on x86_64:
Summary of test results:
4166 PASS
24 UNSUPPORTED
12 XFAIL
6 XPASS
I'll try to test it on other archs, but testing from others (especially
cross-compilation would be great).
Kind regards,
Petr
Petr Vorel (2):
configure: R
Hi,
Maybe the naming isn't quite right:
I guess libc_hidden_nolink should be libc_hidden_nolink_sunrpc (thus files in
sunrpc/ will not have to be renamed) => v4.
I kept libnsl_hidden_nolink_def. I could rename it to libnsl_hidden_nolink if
desired.
Kind regards,
Petr
n added in or before version 2.28.
Replacement implementations based on TIRPC, which additionally support
IPv6, are available from <https://github.com/thkukuk/>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
INSTALL | 9 ---
NEWS | 8 +++
ave-GLIBC_2.28
# svc_auth_unix.c -> svc_authux.c
# xdr_reference.c -> xdr_ref.c
-headers = rpc/netdb.h
+install-others = $(inst_sysconfdir)/rpc
ifeq ($(build-shared),yes)
need-export-routines := auth_des auth_unix clnt_gen clnt_perr clnt_tcp \
Petr Vorel (2):
configure: Remo
Hi,
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > i would try to see why /etc is not created in the testroot.
> Maybe it was only previously created as part of installing /etc/rpc there
> and the patch is causing that file no longer to be installed?
Found that. That was the missing piece.
ins
Hi Szabolcs, Joseph,
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > i would try to see why /etc is not created in the testroot.
> Maybe it was only previously created as part of installing /etc/rpc there
> and the patch is causing that file no longer to be installed?
Thanks for your tips! Inde
> Hi,
> I'm still having issues with elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update when
> running with both commits (it's ok when running only first commit).
OK, I noticed core dump (can be reproduced):
systemd-coredump[26018]: Process 26016 (ld-linux-x86-64) of user 1000 dumped
core.
PID: 2601
n added in or before version 2.28.
Replacement implementations based on TIRPC, which additionally support
IPv6, are available from <https://github.com/thkukuk/>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
INSTALL | 9 ---
NEWS | 8 +++
e etc directory. Simple creating etc directory and copying
ld.so.conf does not help (I'm not surprised).
Und yes, I have cross-compiling = no as Szabolcs noted.
What can be wrong? Do I run testing in a wrong way?
Or did I really introduced bug in second commit?
Kind regards,
Petr
Petr Vorel
Hi,
[ Cc: Debian glibc maintainers and Buildroot maintainer (the only distros I'm
aware of they use it, although there will be others) ]
> The 06/04/2020 12:35, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > The Sun RPC headers are not built, rpcgen program, librpcsvc and
> > test for bug #20790 ar
17 matches
Mail list logo
