On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:28:31PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
I don't know if it's significant, but upstream announced .18 today with
the following changelog:
Changes from binutils 2.13.90.0.16:
...
5. Fix an
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:43:55AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up -
Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific.
interesting. I am running glibc-2.3 and
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Yann Dirson writes:
I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
as
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Yann Dirson writes:
I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
as
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:04:20AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:39:36AM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
SO far I have had very good results with glibc-2.3 on m68k-linux,
what are the problems here?
The problem is just that I don't know. There doesn't seem
5 matches
Mail list logo
