Hello,
The new tau package fails to build on mips because it does not find
sys/cdefs.h. Looks like all other archs have that header in the
default build environment, but for mips it seems to require
libc6-dev-mips64, which is probably not indended for 32bit targets.
What do you suggest ?
[resend with bugs CC'd]
Hello,
Context:
http://bugs.debian.org/734318 - tulip: [amd64] segfaults inside dlopen when
loading plugins
http://bugs.debian.org/723982 - dlopen: segfaults right inside call_init
What we get here is a number of plugins that when dlopen'd cause an
obscure segfault
found 723982 eglibc/2.17-92+b1
found 723982 eglibc/2.17-97
block 703041 with 723982
thanks
Bug#723982 is still reproducible in current jessie, using libc6
2.17-97, and impairs debugging of the problems preventing an upload of
tulip 4.x.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-4
Severity: wishlist
When eg. LC_CTYPE gets set by error with double-quotes inside (eg. by
wrongly writing LC_CTYPE=foo in /etc/environment), then nothing
distinguishes the set-but-wrong variable from a defaulted one in the
locale(1) output, and the messages themselves
.
-- no debconf information
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:46:51AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
For anyone else as confused by this message as I was: the relative in
the subject line should be absolute.
Thanks for pointing that out Daniel - let's blame the lack of sleep, as usual :)
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:46:51AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
For anyone else as confused by this message as I was: the relative in
the subject line should be absolute.
Thanks for pointing that out Daniel - let's blame the lack of sleep, as usual :)
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED
2003 i586
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL
2003 i586
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL
This problem appears to be fixed in woody and sid. I guess it can be
closed now.
~[505]$ ulimit -v 81920
~[506]$ tail /dev/zero
tail: memory exhausted
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro
: Shared libraries an
--
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED
: Shared libraries an
--
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support managerResponsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED
,
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
,
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Yann Dirson writes:
I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself.
Madkiss
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Yann Dirson writes:
I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself.
Madkiss
they decided to hide the symbol ?
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/
that this is a problem of
backward compatibility removed in 2.3, and probably is a bug in libc6.
What do glibc people think ?
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Freedom, Power
that this is a problem of
backward compatibility removed in 2.3, and probably is a bug in libc6.
What do glibc people think ?
Regards,
--
Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Why make M$-Bill richer richer ?
Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Freedom, Power
19 matches
Mail list logo
