[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 Carlos O'Donell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlos_odonell at m

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-22 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #11 from Carlos O'Donell 2012-06-22 22:08:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Based on experience from the sinking feeling of watching target milestones > slowly march forward on the Mozilla and Chromium bugtrackers: could you ta

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-06-24 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #26 from Carlos O'Donell 2012-06-24 22:03:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > When a bug has been known for over 4 years and there's such a simple fix, why > is there discussion of putting off fixing it until later? Or am I > mis

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-10-02 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #29 from Carlos O'Donell 2012-10-02 21:20:23 UTC --- Jonathan, Could you please open one new issue per backport request and use keywords to mark which branch to backport the patch to. Also we expect the person or groups that need

[Bug stdio/6530] *printf() and incomplete multibyte sequences returns -1 bogusly

2012-10-02 Thread carlos_odonell at mentor dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6530 --- Comment #31 from Carlos O'Donell 2012-10-03 00:54:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > Sure, no problem. > > Do I understand correctly that this means testing the patch against > 2.16, 2.15, 2.14, 2.12, and 2.11 and then filing one bug