Re: [RFC] Let the locales packaege be a different source package

2004-12-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:26:15 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Another exampel of problem is debian/patches/locale-sr_CS.dpatch which > > is not applied currently. It's currently disabled because glibc's > > locale/iso-*.def files are not updated. I wonder why you don't know > > such issue if you w

Re: [RFC] Let the locales packaege be a different source package

2004-12-19 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:26:15PM +0100, wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 07:46:09PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:48:56 +0100, > > Denis Barbier wrote: > > > This package is optional but cannot be updated because libc6 is frozen > > > for a long time. Is there any chanc

Re: [RFC] Let the locales packaege be a different source package

2004-12-19 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 07:46:09PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:48:56 +0100, > Denis Barbier wrote: > > This package is optional but cannot be updated because libc6 is frozen > > for a long time. Is there any chance for the locales package to have > > its own source package

Re: [RFC] Let the locales packaege be a different source package

2004-12-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:48:56 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > This package is optional but cannot be updated because libc6 is frozen > for a long time. Is there any chance for the locales package to have > its own source package in the future? There's debian/patches/11_cvs_locales.dpatch. Petter ch

[RFC] Let the locales packaege be a different source package

2004-12-19 Thread Denis Barbier
This package is optional but cannot be updated because libc6 is frozen for a long time. Is there any chance for the locales package to have its own source package in the future? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT