Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#1050901: libc6:amd64: install /usr/lib64 without including it
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
reassign -1 usrmerge
retitle -1 usrmerge: providing /usr/lib64 breaks external software
tags -1 + wontfix
Hi,
On 2023-09-01 19:56, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-31 09:38, L
Hi,
On 2022-10-02 06:27, Szilfai Balázs wrote:
> Sorry, I attached it.
Thanks a lot. For the record, here is the backtrace with the debugging
symbols attached:
#0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=,
signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44
#1 0x7f05dfb
On 2022-10-01 22:36, Szilfai Balázs wrote:
> Core dump attached.
Thanks, could you please attach the following file instead of the text
output?
/var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.nscd.0.e89b6fce3d004f04b16f3e5a8f439a82.2560572.166465611000.zst
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno
Core dump attached.
--
Balazs Szilfai
PID: 2560572 (nscd)
UID: 0 (root)
GID: 0 (root)
Signal: 6 (ABRT)
Timestamp: Sat 2022-10-01 22:28:30 CEST (4min 28s ago)
Command Line: /usr/sbin/nscd
Executable: /usr/sbin/nscd
Control Group: /system.slice/n
Package: nscd
Version: 2.35-1
kern.log:
Oct 1 16:07:02 www kernel: [1041475.994914] nscd[119940]: segfault at 0 ip
7f6427012b59 sp 7f641b54e928 error 4 in libc.so.6[7f6426ee3000+17]
Oct 1 16:07:02 www kernel: [1041475.994920] Code: fe 7f 5c 17 e1 c5 f8 77 c3 0f 1f
84 00 00 00 00 0
Hello,
Adhemerval Zanella, le lun. 19 oct. 2020 15:44:03 -0300, a ecrit:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:09 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> > FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk
> > FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk-pie
>
> Just to you know these tests were never actually pushed upstream.
> They came from the debian
> pa
On 2020-10-19 15:44, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:09 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> >
> > Source: glibc
> > Version: 2.31-4
> > Severity: normal
> > User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: alpha hppa ia64 m68k sh4 sparc64
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > The two t
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:09 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> Source: glibc
> Version: 2.31-4
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: alpha hppa ia64 m68k sh4 sparc64
>
> Hello!
>
> The two tests:
>
> FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk
> FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk-pie
Just to you kn
Source: glibc
Version: 2.31-4
Severity: normal
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha hppa ia64 m68k sh4 sparc64
Hello!
The two tests:
FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk
FAIL: misc/tst-sbrk-pie
fail on multiple architectures.
According to the discussion in #debian-ports, the tests are broken and
Fixed in glibc, but not in CLDR yet:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22996
HI,
thanks for your answer, I will collect references in order to fill the
ticket in CLDR.
Здравейте,
Преди месец ви изпратих имейл за вашият късен роднина. Получихте ли го?
Control: reassign 886447 libc6
Control: merge 886447 887169
This is the same issue, as far as I can tell (see the github bug report for
details).
diff -Nru glibc-2.24/debian/changelog glibc-2.24/debian/changelog
--- glibc-2.24/debian/changelog 2017-08-26 05:09:24.0 -0400
+++ glibc-2.24/debian/changelog 2017-10-09 08:37:50.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+glibc (2.24-18) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable lock elision on ppc64el.
Malte, on ven. 26 mai 2017 15:53:20 +, wrote:
> what would we have to do to make this happen?
as mentioned by Aurelien in his previous mail:
“this has to be done at the upstream level. We don't want to diverge
from upstream in the features and symbols we provide, as it will break
compatibilit
Hi,
what would we have to do to make this happen?
I am also one of the people who would like to use bcrypt with Dovecot.
I think asking people why they would like to do this is very
condescending, but the answer is not so far fetched: We would like
to make use of the user management of a piece o
Hi,
On 2016-10-25 12:11, Erdem Bayer wrote:
> Dear maintainer
>
> This update and the following 2016h did not hit the stable and oldstable
> repos, even though both updates are in testing repo for a long time now.
tzdata 2016h will only reach stable in the next stable update. The
release team ha
Dear maintainer
This update and the following 2016h did not hit the stable and oldstable
repos, even though both updates are in testing repo for a long time now.
Also the relevant tzdata-java package did not seem to be generated in
testing, there is no tzdata-java package in testing. So somet
Looks like the usual lock b0rkage where something tries to unlock an
already unlocked lock, to me. In that case, it is a simple software
bug.
However, if (and only if) it only happens under x32, but works fine
under amd64 on the same box, it could be a bug somewhere else (kernel,
libpthreads, pro
What possible use is this? This is what /etc/hosts is for.
Thank you
It looked like a bug to me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201302142036.16193.bug...@byortek.com
I forgot to tell that my wheezy install is about 3 weeks old.
I use a local mirror that is not updated
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201302141654.207
Package: nscd
Version: 2.11.3-4
This is the output of nscd in squeeze:
# nscd -i groups
nscd: 'groups' is not a known database
Try `nscd --help' or `nscd --usage' for more information.
IMO, we can close this bug.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debia
The upstream GLIBC GIT commit for this fix is:
9c96ff23858b0759e12ad69e3c4599931c90bee8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110814.041345.20617034254
We just discovered that we are also experiencing this same issue on
CentOS 6 and Fedora 14. We are not experiencing the issue under CentOS
5 and Ubuntu 10.04. So this issue does not appear to be Debian-specific.
Furthermore, we also discovered that using a different DNS server (the
Google DNS se
Mảnh đất thổ cư diện tích 80 m2 – cần bán, mặt tiền rộng 6.8m, sâu
12m, khu Vân Nội - Vân Trì – Đông Anh, cách đường dẫn lên cầu Nhật
Tân 2 km, gần đường liên xã rộng 8m,, mặt đường đang làm bê tông rộng
5m, oto vào được, làm sổ đỏ chính chủ, giá 24 Trieu/ m2, gia cach day
4 thang la 14 trieu.
merge 584778 585051
tag 584778 + fixed-upstream
tag 584778 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:47:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> >On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >>Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions t
On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been
added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it
will be for later.
All that said, I don't plan to disable --wit
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been
> added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it
> will be for later.
>
> All that said, I don't plan to disable --with-multi-arch.
Aurelien, you mention
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:45:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote:
>> I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11
>> and
>> gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also
>> works.
>
> no, it's
On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote:
I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and
gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also
works.
no, it's not 2.11, but 2.11 glibc built --with-multi-arch. Would the glibc
maintainer
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> You mentionned rebuilding Qt 4. Does it happen with binaries you have
> rebuilt yourself, or at least that link to libraries you have rebuilt
> yourself?
Yes
> If yes, make sure you don't have binutils-gold installed, as it is
> currently broken
On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
> > I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> > x86_64 users running on Core i7.
>
> I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
> problem. And downgr
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:01:45PM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
> > > I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> > > x86_64 users running on Core i7.
> >
> > I can only tell you
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:44:43AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
>
> > I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> > x86_64 users running on Core i7.
>
> I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
>
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
> I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
> x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
problem. And downgrading eglibc helped.
> Does only Qt related applications c
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:38:45AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> I probably have the same problem: running Sid x86_64 I updated to eglibc
> 2.11.1-3 (from 2.10.2-9) and apps are crashing. E.g. I tried to build Qt
> 4.6.3
> and qmake is crashing while configuring.
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo:
>
> m
I probably have the same problem: running Sid x86_64 I updated to eglibc
2.11.1-3 (from 2.10.2-9) and apps are crashing. E.g. I tried to build Qt 4.6.3
and qmake is crashing while configuring.
cat /proc/cpuinfo:
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
gcc -v:
gcc ver
Subject: Problem on apt-get dist-upgrade with libc-bin (2.10.2-6
Debian:testing) [libc-bin on libc6]
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18lenny2
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: L
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:33:26PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> > > may be the cause of the problem you reported.
> >
> > This problem is already fixed in
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> > may be the cause of the problem you reported.
>
> This problem is already fixed in 2.11.1 or master. Have you also applied
> the proper _second_ patch in tha
> This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> may be the cause of the problem you reported.
This problem is already fixed in 2.11.1 or master. Have you also applied
the proper _second_ patch in that bug? C.f. my and H.J.Lu's comments and
mailing list posts.
Right on schedule, it is happening again:
P ID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
COMMAND
9915 root 20 0 1902m 1.3g 1468 S0 53.5 3:23.99 nscd
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 540775 540777
Bug#540775: nscd: using 100% of cpu immediately after start
Bug#540777: nscd: using 100% of cpu immediately after start
Merged 540775 540777.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
On Thu, 07 May 2009 10:47 +0200, "Aurelien Jarno"
wrote:
> >
>
> There has been a lot of change in glibc 2.9-10 to workarounds broken
> routers. I think that what has help, and that's why I was asking you the
> versions.
Hi Aurelien,
Just to confirm after a half day running the 2.9.10 versi
Didrik Pinte a écrit :
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> I have just followed what comes in sid ;-)
>
> Thus, with the annoucement of the "glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low"
> on 28th of April, I started to have a very slow network and huge latency
> problems with my computer.
>
> Activating ipv6 support on
Hi Aurelien,
I have just followed what comes in sid ;-)
Thus, with the annoucement of the "glibc (2.9-8) unstable; urgency=low"
on 28th of April, I started to have a very slow network and huge latency
problems with my computer.
Activating ipv6 support on the router helped a bit but did not reall
Could this be the same as Red Hat bug #428837? The symptoms are the
same ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428837
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
libc6.postinst has "some init scripts don't match the package names"
remark and it doesn't specifically handle mysql-server case there, but
mysql initscript is called "mysql". So, postinst just says "WARNING: init
script for mysql-server not found" and doesn't restart mysql.
--
WBR, wRAR (ALT Lin
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 05:49:14PM -0500, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> How would folk feel about the addition of the following test under
> NOTES? Are the staments about x86-64 accurate?
>
>On architectures where int and pointer types are the same
>size (e.g., x86-32, where both ty
How would folk feel about the addition of the following test under
NOTES? Are the staments about x86-64 accurate?
On architectures where int and pointer types are the same
size (e.g., x86-32, where both types are 32 bits), you
may be able to get away with passing pointers
Michael Kerrisk a écrit :
> I'm the upstream upstream man-pages maintainer. I'd entertain a patch
> to improve the documentation, or if someone can give a clear, simple
> explanation of what needs to be changed, I'll do the patch myself.
>
> It sounds like some people on this thread have already
I'm the upstream upstream man-pages maintainer. I'd entertain a patch
to improve the documentation, or if someone can give a clear, simple
explanation of what needs to be changed, I'll do the patch myself.
It sounds like some people on this thread have already done some
digging, and I don't want
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Allard Hoeve wrote:
> We run clusters of about 15 webservers that are reloaded for new
> configs about twenty times per day. This results in the following
> error about once per day per cluster:
>
> apache2: nscd_helper.c:133: __nscd_unmap: Assertion mapped->counter
> ==
I've found a workaround in linking my app with libpthread, now i can run it
inside gdb without the error "Cannot find new threads: generic error "
There must be some mismatch between glibc and pthread.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:15:08PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> reopen 65458
> reassign 65458 libc6
> quit
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:03:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the libc6 packag
reopen 65458
reassign 65458 libc6
quit
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:03:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the libc6 package:
>
> #65458: sed: regexp performance woeful
>
> It has been closed by Cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 65458
Bug#65458: sed: regexp performance woeful
Bug#155751: sed: woody version more than 1000 times slower than potato version
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 65458 libc6
Bug#65458: sed: regexp performance woeful
Bug#155751: sed
fixed in glibc upstream, see also bug 475474
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I did a mess with my mail accounts and the report from Gallien Dominique
are in fact mine. Sorry
Best regards
--
Gallien Matthieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 441975 - unreproducible
reopen 441975
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 441975 - unreproducible
reopen 441975
thanks
I believe the bug is still here as my report show it
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 441975 - unreproducible
thanks
I believe we hase saw enough reports to say that this bug is reproducible.
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello ,
Hey! I have been trying to get in touch with you. I finally got a cam so you
can see me when we talk. http://ca.geocities.com/kellyas0021/cam.html
--
This e-mail was sent through the "XA-speakers" file database. The webmasters of
the "XA-speakers" file database take no responsi
Your message dated Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:42:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361091: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Subject: locales: *** update-locale: Error: LANGUAGE ("it_IT:it:en_GB:en") is
not compatible with LANG ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.6-5
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archi
who are you
We need this implemented by March 26 or the wrong time will be reported.
It would be nice if this could also be fixed in sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 299137 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 298488 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 175163 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Here is the website you wanted to visit
We carry only the highest quality Replica Watches
here are a few of your selections
Datejust Turnograph-SilverFace
Cosmograph Daytona-WhiteFaceLeatherbandSilverBezel
Submariner Silver-GoldBandBlackFace
http://nklex.bestwatchez.org
Hello,
Here is the website you wanted to visit
We carry only the highest quality Replica Watches
here are a few of your selections
Day-Date Goldband-Goldface-DiamondNumbers
MensPearlmaster SilverBandPearlWhiteFace
MensPearlmaster Silver/GoldBandPearlWhiteFace
http://nwe.bestwatchez.org
Hello,
Here is the website you wanted to visit
We carry only the highest quality Replica Watches
here are a few of your selections
Cosmograph Daytona-WhiteFaceLeatherbandGoldBezel
Cosmograph SilverDaytona-BlackFace
Submariner 50thAnniversarySpecialEdition
http://damyui.besttimewatches.net
Hello,
Here is the website you wanted to visit
We carry only the highest quality Replica Watches
here are a few of your selections
Submariner Silver-GoldBandBlueFace
MensPearlmaster SilverBandPearlWhiteFace
Day-Date Silverband-SilverfaceDiamondNumbers
http://fpu.besttimewatches.net
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notforwarded 287121
Bug#287121: streamtuner: segmentation fault
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0 M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Ca l l this number: 1- 315-546-9663 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorat
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0 M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Ca l l this number: 1- 315-546-9663 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorat
I just reviewed your m o r tgage info. You are appro ve d with
2.35 % fixedr a t e. Please visit this page today and specify your application ID
#138745922584 to confirm everything.
Thank you.
Stacy
RXD Bank
yvovfuta- hsoompdy btpbhyf hyxbbln ydybjg fvknmm, kvdgo uivoqn
ujmcf azanir plfnhu
I just reviewed your m o r tgage info. You are appro ve d with
2.35 % fixedr a t e. Please visit this page today and specify your application ID
#138745922584 to confirm everything.
Thank you.
Stacy
RXD Bank
yvovfuta- hsoompdy btpbhyf hyxbbln ydybjg fvknmm, kvdgo uivoqn
ujmcf azanir plfnhu
wahpwqye. pdqpdl, kcgqe ajsbeuxk
opjsek vdtmziilx- hxuxu
sjznzlir. kgtjwgylb xdohcxefj
kzgbpvvoo sdccgzcfc rlbqqjhcr skarzdzk oepfgr
ewsbx- xilbt- zbjaum mykovlmd vaxiapb
xixrlloj egmcs, khaxs
qrjtvnj btqwf. qwfgt
tvhrd msoml. zdfhkvuo ifkanppr kdwyu
ybbzejdmt fbdzudca tpkptiuc ifwkrrs
ydrigoy
wahpwqye. pdqpdl, kcgqe ajsbeuxk
opjsek vdtmziilx- hxuxu
sjznzlir. kgtjwgylb xdohcxefj
kzgbpvvoo sdccgzcfc rlbqqjhcr skarzdzk oepfgr
ewsbx- xilbt- zbjaum mykovlmd vaxiapb
xixrlloj egmcs, khaxs
qrjtvnj btqwf. qwfgt
tvhrd msoml. zdfhkvuo ifkanppr kdwyu
ybbzejdmt fbdzudca tpkptiuc ifwkrrs
ydrigoy
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Call this number: 1-315-546-9663 (24 h ours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorate
(
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Call this number: 1-315-546-9663 (24 h ours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorate
(
New unique offer! You can get 0% mor`tgage ra'te for
this week only!
0% means ZER0. No percent at
all!!! Can you
find the better offers?
Minimum info required. Up to $ 1,000,000 1oan
available.
0nly 3 days left!
Refi.nance or Buy a home of your dr.eam now!
mxgdviz hyhwj swrhks mnzbijr ybsep
New unique offer! You can get 0% mor`tgage ra'te for
this week only!
0% means ZER0. No percent at
all!!! Can you
find the better offers?
Minimum info required. Up to $ 1,000,000 1oan
available.
0nly 3 days left!
Refi.nance or Buy a home of your dr.eam now!
mxgdviz hyhwj swrhks mnzbijr ybsep
3.03% 3.03% 3.03%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
3.03% 3.03% 3.03%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
3.10% 3.10% 3.10%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
3.10% 3.10% 3.10%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
3.16% 3.16% 3.16%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
3.16% 3.16% 3.16%
Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!
*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month
Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.
http://www.finalsavings.com/save.php
http://www.finalsavings.com/sa
From: Lottie Ortiz
CC: L.oan Department
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 06:28:59 -0500
Re: L.oan preap.roval
Sir:
We have reviewed you information and glad to inform you
that you qualifyfor 3% mor.tgage r.ate under
our company le.nding program.
Please use this
URL below to enter
From: Lottie Ortiz
CC: L.oan Department
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 06:28:59 -0500
Re: L.oan preap.roval
Sir:
We have reviewed you information and glad to inform you
that you qualifyfor 3% mor.tgage r.ate under
our company le.nding program.
Please use this
URL below to enter
Sun, 16 May 2004 23:37:37 -0500
The First Gove.rnment Mo'rtga'ge Program. Under a new bil1,
we have aspecial budget to help you and
your family. A lot of privileges available.
0nly 50 spots 0pen left
App1y
here
wbaaspw jbnzradl ckyqsaer. rwxsupmu pznnt gztzll. ygkhqmxc jkaabqjgt dpkozjjb
bk
Sun, 16 May 2004 23:37:37 -0500
The First Gove.rnment Mo'rtga'ge Program. Under a new bil1,
we have aspecial budget to help you and
your family. A lot of privileges available.
0nly 50 spots 0pen left
App1y
here
wbaaspw jbnzradl ckyqsaer. rwxsupmu pznnt gztzll. ygkhqmxc jkaabqjgt dpkozjjb
bk
New unique offer! You can get 0% mor'tgage ra'te for
the first week of May only!
0% means ZER0. No percent at all!!! Can you
find the better offers?
Minimum info required. Up to $ 1,000,000 1oan
available.
0nly 8 days left!
Refi.nance or Buy a home of your dr.eam now!
gyorhkjhi fkqod, fpproa
New unique offer! You can get 0% mor'tgage ra'te for
the first week of May only!
0% means ZER0. No percent at all!!! Can you
find the better offers?
Minimum info required. Up to $ 1,000,000 1oan
available.
0nly 8 days left!
Refi.nance or Buy a home of your dr.eam now!
gyorhkjhi fkqod, fpproa
Fri, 07 May 2004 15:13:05 -0500
Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your mor.tgage applicat.ion we
received yesterday.
We are happy to confirm that your appli cation is accepted and you can
get only 3 % fixed ra te.
Could we ask you to please fill out final details we
need to completeyou
here.
We
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
