Bug#129774: libc6; /lib/libc.so.6 is not a valid ELF file

2003-01-15 Thread John Wiegley
> On Wed Jan 15, Philip writes: > This bug has seen no activity in a long time. Submitter, if you > still feel that this is an issue (and the problem still exists with > glibc 2.3.1), can you supply some more details? Like Ben said > previously, I'm not aware of any specific requirement that

Bug#129774: libc6; /lib/libc.so.6 is not a valid ELF file

2003-01-15 Thread Philip Blundell
tags 129774 + moreinfo retitle 129774 STT_SECTION symbols do not match section table thanks > If you dump the contents of the file with "readelf -a", you'll see > that the number of sections in the section header table is less than > the number of STT_SECTION symbols in the symbol table. This cau