On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 07:10:39AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Anyone know off hand where we can get a definitive list of architectures
> we should support? I have no problem adding this, but it would be nice to
> sanity check it when we're adding new things.
hmm, dpkg includes a list of archs, a
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 07:10:39AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Anyone know off hand where we can get a definitive list of architectures
> we should support? I have no problem adding this, but it would be nice to
> sanity check it when we're adding new things.
hmm, dpkg includes a list of archs, a
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> the following patch enabled and fixes building on the not yet release
> s390x (64bit s390) architecture.
Anyone know off hand where we can get a definitive list of architectures
we should support? I have no problem adding this, but
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: wishlist
the following patch enabled and fixes building on the not yet release
s390x (64bit s390) architecture.
bastian
--
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
diff -urN glibc-2.3.1.orig/
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> the following patch enabled and fixes building on the not yet release
> s390x (64bit s390) architecture.
Anyone know off hand where we can get a definitive list of architectures
we should support? I have no problem adding this, but
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: wishlist
the following patch enabled and fixes building on the not yet release
s390x (64bit s390) architecture.
bastian
--
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
diff -urN glibc-2.3.1.orig
6 matches
Mail list logo
