Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-07 Thread Ralf Baechle
; Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > debian-mips@lists.debian.org, Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals? > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > From: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-07 Thread Ralf Baechle
; Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals? > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > From: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-07 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Ralf Baechle wrote: [snip] > So basically I like Thiemo's suggestion for the fix. But - the purpose > of the three unused 32-bit fields in struct msgid64_ds is dealing with > the year 2038 problem. So maybe we should reorder fields like: > > [...] > #if defined(CONFIG_MIPS32) && !defined(CONFIG_

Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-07 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Ralf Baechle wrote: [snip] > So basically I like Thiemo's suggestion for the fix. But - the purpose > of the three unused 32-bit fields in struct msgid64_ds is dealing with > the year 2038 problem. So maybe we should reorder fields like: > > [...] > #if defined(CONFIG_MIPS32) && !defined(CONFIG_

Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-02 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The original reason for the kernel change was a bug report from Atushi > Nemoto about a mismatch of the and libc msqid_ds. It seems there are > already libcs with this patch in circulation which at least Atushi and > me seemed to hav

Bug#200215: some debug info... gdb and strace broken on casals?

2003-10-02 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The original reason for the kernel change was a bug report from Atushi > Nemoto about a mismatch of the and libc msqid_ds. It seems there are > already libcs with this patch in circulation which at least Atushi and > me seemed to hav