On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 01:39:21AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Is this bug alive? Moreover, is this really linux-kernel-headers bug?
The latest modutils on ia64 is existed, so it can be closed, I think.
I see no reason to keep it open.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this bug alive? Moreover, is this really linux-kernel-headers bug?
The latest modutils on ia64 is existed, so it can be closed, I think.
At Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:36:47 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:09:51AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Is this bug alive? Moreover, is this really linux-kernel-headers bug?
The latest modutils on ia64 is existed, so it can be closed, I think.
At Sat, 3 Jan 2004 13:36:47 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:09:51AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:09:51AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
- Forwarded message from dann frazier
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
- Forwarded message from dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
- Forwarded message from dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
6 matches
Mail list logo