At Sun, 16 May 2004 15:59:38 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 22:53]:
util-linux-2.12-7 build with it.
tct and sg3-utils build fine now as well. Thanks.
Thanks checking!
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 22:53]:
util-linux-2.12-7 build with it.
tct and sg3-utils build fine now as well. Thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Sun, 16 May 2004 15:59:38 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-15 22:53]:
util-linux-2.12-7 build with it.
tct and sg3-utils build fine now as well. Thanks.
Thanks checking!
Regards,
-- gotom
At Tue, 11 May 2004 15:50:50 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't
GOTO Masanori wrote:
[snip]
I've put the patch into linux-kernel-headers cvs. Unfortunatelly
Thiemo's patch is failed to apply for lkh cvs because asm.h is not
existed. I fixed some parts. It'll be out after checking lkh related
bugs.
Could someone try to build the latest lkh and
At Tue, 11 May 2004 15:50:50 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't
GOTO Masanori wrote:
[snip]
I've put the patch into linux-kernel-headers cvs. Unfortunatelly
Thiemo's patch is failed to apply for lkh cvs because asm.h is not
existed. I fixed some parts. It'll be out after checking lkh related
bugs.
Could someone try to build the latest lkh and
At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how
that would affect the other 10 architectures, and
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how
that would affect the other 10 architectures, and there were already lots
and lots of changes in the MU.
Well, that
At Tue, 11 May 2004 05:47:06 +0200,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how
that would affect the other 10 architectures, and
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-10 09:26]:
util-linux and raidtools are listed as RC bugs. Martin can probably
provide a longer list of such packages.
There were about 10-15 packages, including:
sg3-utils
tct
raidtools
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
FYI util-linux has a patch ready to NMU in the BTS that uses the 64bit
lseek instead of the 32bit llseek, thereby reducing the number of
arguments and avoiding a syscall with 5 arguments.
And that patch wasn't included in
At Mon, 10 May 2004 07:21:18 +0200,
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
Which packages did this bug
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 10 May 2004 07:21:18 +0200,
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-10 09:26]:
util-linux and raidtools are listed as RC bugs. Martin can probably
provide a longer list of such packages.
There were about 10-15 packages, including:
sg3-utils
tct
raidtools
atari-fdisk
sleuthkit
fdclone
--
Martin Michlmayr
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
Which packages did this bug affect? I agreed with Thiemo's and
Goswin's opinion:
I wonder
At Mon, 10 May 2004 07:21:18 +0200,
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
Which packages did this bug
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 10 May 2004 07:21:18 +0200,
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-10 09:26]:
util-linux and raidtools are listed as RC bugs. Martin can probably
provide a longer list of such packages.
There were about 10-15 packages, including:
sg3-utils
tct
raidtools
atari-fdisk
sleuthkit
fdclone
--
Martin Michlmayr
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-10 09:26]:
util-linux and raidtools are listed as RC bugs. Martin can probably
provide a longer list of such packages.
There were about 10-15 packages, including:
sg3-utils
tct
raidtools
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:04:24AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
And that patch wasn't included in the last MU because I wasn't sure how
that would affect the other 10 architectures, and there were already lots
and lots of changes in the MU.
Well, that and the fact that it's really a
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
FYI util-linux has a patch ready to NMU in the BTS that uses the 64bit
lseek instead of the 32bit llseek, thereby reducing the number of
arguments and avoiding a syscall with 5 arguments.
And that patch wasn't included in
At Mon, 3 May 2004 18:50:18 +0100,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
Which packages did this bug affect? I agreed with Thiemo's and
Goswin's opinion:
I wonder if it would be time to convert
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 234236 grave
thanks
This is a grave bug since it keeps about 10-15 packages from building
on mips.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
25 matches
Mail list logo