On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:09:47PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:17:01 +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > long double a=0.1;
> > return (int) log2l(a);
> > }
> >
> > I got the following warning, which should not happen according
> > to the man
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:09:47PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:17:01 +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > long double a=0.1;
> > return (int) log2l(a);
> > }
> >
> > I got the following warning, which should not happen according
> > to the man
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:17:01AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
>
> Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
> and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
>
> Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
>
> #include
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:17:01AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
>
> Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
> and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
>
> Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
>
> #include
>
> Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
#include
int main(void)
{
long double a=0.1;
return (int) log2l(a);
}
I got the following
> Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
#include
int main(void)
{
long double a=0.1;
return (int) log2l(a);
}
I got the following
> Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
#include
int main(void)
{
long double a=0.1;
return (int) log2l(a);
}
I got the following
> Read /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h.
Have you compiled a sample code with log2l() and
and checked whether a warning was displayed? I doubt it.
Could you compile the following code with "gcc -Wall"?
#include
int main(void)
{
long double a=0.1;
return (int) log2l(a);
}
I got the following
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
Tha man page log2l(3) says that log2l() is declared when we include
. But no header file declares log2l().
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i68
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal
Tha man page log2l(3) says that log2l() is declared when we include
. But no header file declares log2l().
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i68
10 matches
Mail list logo
