At Fri, 21 May 2004 10:52:00 +0400,
Alexander Gordeyev wrote:
> GM> You may get the different result with the latest glibc 2.3.2.ds1
> GM> instead of 2.2.5 old woody version.
>
> Nope, we can't, since we stuck to stable release. I didn't check it against
> glibc-2.3.2, but the source from http:/
At Fri, 21 May 2004 10:52:00 +0400,
Alexander Gordeyev wrote:
> GM> You may get the different result with the latest glibc 2.3.2.ds1
> GM> instead of 2.2.5 old woody version.
>
> Nope, we can't, since we stuck to stable release. I didn't check it against
> glibc-2.3.2, but the source from http:/
At Thu, 20 May 2004 12:53:54 +0400,
Alexander Gordeyev wrote:
> I participate in development some kind of Linux emulator under Windows. We
> use Debian as packaging system in our project, because I'm reporting
> straighit to you (as glibc guys reccomended). The bug (I beleive its the
> bug) we met
At Thu, 20 May 2004 12:53:54 +0400,
Alexander Gordeyev wrote:
> I participate in development some kind of Linux emulator under Windows. We
> use Debian as packaging system in our project, because I'm reporting
> straighit to you (as glibc guys reccomended). The bug (I beleive its the
> bug) we met
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-6
I participate in development some kind of Linux emulator under Windows. We
use Debian as packaging system in our project, because I'm reporting
straighit to you (as glibc guys reccomended). The bug (I beleive its the
bug) we met couldn't be reproduced under usual Li
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-6
I participate in development some kind of Linux emulator under Windows. We
use Debian as packaging system in our project, because I'm reporting
straighit to you (as glibc guys reccomended). The bug (I beleive its the
bug) we met couldn't be reproduced under usual Li
6 matches
Mail list logo