Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-16 Thread GOTO Masanori
severity 253030 important thanks I fixed this problem with binary NMU 2.3.2.ds1-13.0.1_ia64. However, according to Jeff, this bug may be still appeared. I downgrade it to important. Note that, unfortunatelly, I built NMU stuff on merulo.debian.org, but it was not appeared. At Tue, 8 Jun 2004

Processed: Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 253030 important Bug#253030: depends on libc6 on ia64 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-16 Thread GOTO Masanori
severity 253030 important thanks I fixed this problem with binary NMU 2.3.2.ds1-13.0.1_ia64. However, according to Jeff, this bug may be still appeared. I downgrade it to important. Note that, unfortunatelly, I built NMU stuff on merulo.debian.org, but it was not appeared. At Tue, 8 Jun 2004

Processed: Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 253030 important Bug#253030: depends on libc6 on ia64 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-08 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:35:29 -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:31:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:21:57 +0200, Ooh what has happened!? According to the GPG signature on the .changes,

Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-08 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:00:41PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: So this $(libc) is incorrectly set as libc6, not libc6.1. We only know that the package Depends field is not correct; Lamont, do you have build log or the environment to reappear this problem? Apparenly this behavior is out of

Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-08 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:00:41PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: In past Jeff Bailey built glibc on ia64, and if it was correctly built, then that version of nscd should depend on libc6.1. Jeff, could you check it? We've had this problem before. Lemme see if I can solve it properly. Tks,

Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-08 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:00:41PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: In past Jeff Bailey built glibc on ia64, and if it was correctly built, then that version of nscd should depend on libc6.1. Jeff, could you check it? We've had this problem before. Lemme see if I can solve it properly. Tks,

Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:31:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:21:57 +0200, Ooh what has happened!? According to the GPG signature on the .changes, it was LaMont ... And I uploaded what the autobuilder

Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

2004-06-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:31:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:21:57 +0200, Ooh what has happened!? According to the GPG signature on the .changes, it was LaMont ... And I uploaded what the autobuilder