At Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:59:25 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Yes, this is acceptable.
>
> The current amd64 port does not support the 2.4 kernel at all.
> There is no kernel-image-2.4 package in the amd64 archives
> and I think there never will be one. The 2.4 kernel does not support
> the amd64
On 04-Sep-14 11:18, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:21:39 +0200,
> Using 2.4 or 2.6 kernel is user's decision. I guess amd64 2.4 kernel
> is also used a lot, but I don't know the fact. Note that pthread is
> used in various places, even users do not notice.
>
> If we drop amd64 2.4
At Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:21:39 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> However, I suspect that this magic is not necessary on amd64
> since the amd64 archive works without it. Do we really need
> linuxthreads on amd64? We do not (and will never) support 2.4 kernels
> on amd64, so I guess it is not necessar
On 04-Sep-13 15:05, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> This is because /lib/tls is not used in default even on 2.6 amd64
> kernel. We use some magic to use /lib/tls on i386. So I think it's
> good idea to introduce code which uses /lib/tls on x86_64, instead of
> dropping linuxthreads on 2.4.
Thank you for
At Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:37:20 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> The attached patch changes the following file of the glibc package:
>
> * debian/sysdeps/amd64.mk:
>
> Drop the 'nptl' pass from GLIBC_PASSES.
>
> Use 'nptl' instead of 'linuxthreads' in the 'libc' pass (this requires
> ke
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch changes the following file of the glibc package:
* debian/sysdeps/amd64.mk:
Drop the 'nptl' pass from GLIBC_PASSES.
Use 'nptl' instead of 'linuxthreads' in the 'libc' pass (this requires
kernel >= 2.6.0, but 2.4 is no
6 matches
Mail list logo
