Hello,
On 06-Feb-13 01:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Meanwhile, please find attached my latest version of the patch. I have
> tested the resulting libc, and I was able to compile a simple hello.c,
> and to run it without problem.
thanks for the amended patch. I had to change the line
> +mv debian
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:15:32AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
Hi !
> On 06-Feb-10 12:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Please find attached a new patch, that uses /lib32 and /usr/lib32. There
> > is a lot of difference from the previous patch, so don't hesitate to
> > comment it. I know th
Hello,
On 06-Feb-10 12:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > The '--includedir=/usr/include/i386-linux' is also no longer necessary
> > because this is handled automagically by the wrappers in
> > linux-kernel-headers.
>
> This is not the include path of the kernel headers, but the place were
> to insta
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:39:03AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> I have some small comments on your patch.
>
> On 06-Feb-09 19:52, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > +# build 32-bit (i386) alternative library
> > +GLIBC_PASSES += i386
> > +DEB_ARCH_REGULAR_PACKAGES += libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i
Hello,
I have some small comments on your patch.
On 06-Feb-09 19:52, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> +# build 32-bit (i386) alternative library
> +GLIBC_PASSES += i386
> +DEB_ARCH_REGULAR_PACKAGES += libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i386
> +libc6-i386_shlib_dep = libc6-i386 (>= $(shlib_dep_ver))
> +
> +i386_configur
On 06-Feb-09 23:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I also think it would be better, also because it could be handle easily
> by the current build scripts of the glibc. However, the change seems
> difficult as a lot of libraries is already using it:
>
> unstable
>
> fakechroot
> fakeroot
> ia32-l
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> However, waiting some more will make it more difficult. I think this has
> to be discuss widely. Maybe debian-devel ?
>
Well I have discussed that on irc with Steve Langasek. Here is the log:
The time is in CET format, so the f
> On 06-Feb-09 19:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It seems to work well, at least it produces a usable i386 libc. I have
> > still a few questions though:
> > - Contrary to libc6-dev-amd64 on i386, libc6-dev-i686 does not ship any
> > header file. Is it intentional? Looking at libc6-dev-ppc64,
> >
Hello,
thanks for looking at the patch!
On 06-Feb-09 19:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It seems to work well, at least it produces a usable i386 libc. I have
> still a few questions though:
> - Contrary to libc6-dev-amd64 on i386, libc6-dev-i686 does not ship any
> header file. Is it intentional?
... and the patch.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
diff -u glibc-2.3.6/debian/control glibc-2.3.6/deb
Hi,
I have looked at your patch, I had to tweak it a little as the glibc
version is now 2.3.6. Please find my ver
sion attached. Here are the main changes:
- Make libc6-i386 and libc6-dev-i686 respectively conflicts with the
current version ia32-libs and ia32-libs-dev
- Build-depends on libc6-de
Hi,
Could someone please give an update of the status of this
request? It seems to be open for a long time, and it would be
nice to get rid of ia32-libs.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04-Oct-04 19:48, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 04-Oct-04 12:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > When we do this for amd64, we ought to do the same thing for ia32 as
> > well. Then amd64-libs can lose the libraries.
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Of course a 'libc6-amd64' would be a good thing t
On 04-Oct-04 12:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> When we do this for amd64, we ought to do the same thing for ia32 as
> well. Then amd64-libs can lose the libraries.
Thank you for your reply.
Of course a 'libc6-amd64' would be a good thing to have for
i386/amd64-libs. This should work with a simi
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:13:47PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: glibc
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Finally, there is a patch which creates a 32bit i386 version of libc6
> on amd64 by adding an extra pass to glibc. The new packages 'libc6-i386'
> and 'libc6-dev-i386' install t
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Finally, there is a patch which creates a 32bit i386 version of libc6
on amd64 by adding an extra pass to glibc. The new packages 'libc6-i386'
and 'libc6-dev-i386' install the 32bit libc6 files in /usr/lib32, which
is a symlink to '/emul/ia32-linux/usr
16 matches
Mail list logo
