Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
Severity: critical
File: linux-kernel-header
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock
itself due to atime updates on /dev/ being blocked while the LVM is
locked. Sine
tags 297010 patch
thanks
The attached patch updates asm-*/fcntl.h to the versions in 2.6.10 which
includes O_NOATIME.
Bastian
--
"That unit is a woman."
"A mass of conflicting impulses."
-- Spock and Nomad, "The Changeling", stardate 3541.9
diff -u linux-kernel-h
tags 297010 - patch
reassign 297010 libc6-dev
retitle 297010 libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
thanks
Fixing l-k-h does not help, it is not possible to use asm/fcntl.h and
fcntl.h at the same time. It has to be fixed in
bits/fcntl.h which comes from
$glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/$arch/bits/fcn
At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100,
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: linux-kernel-headers
> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
> Severity: critical
> File: linux-kernel-header
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Hi,
>
> when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock
>
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100,
> Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: linux-kernel-headers
>> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
>> Severity: critical
>> File: linux-kernel-header
>> Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when one tries t
At Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:48:00 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100,
> > Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >> when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock
> >> itself due to atime updates on /dev/ being
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:48:00 +0100,
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Bastian's patch is just a workaround around the bug not its solution.
>
> ...So why did you submit this bug as "severity: critical" assigned to
> linux-kernel-header? What the real sol
tags 297010 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 patch
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 - patch
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> reassign 297010 libc6-dev
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-h
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
> > linux-kernel-headers package?
> >
> > Regards,
> > -- gotom
>
> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
> lvm because it can work around
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
> be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
> actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm
> should have such header
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
>> > linux-kernel-headers package?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > -- gotom
>>
>> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the
> > kernel.
> Ah, I misunderstood, you're right.
I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 fixed-upstream
Bug#297010: libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
> > be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
> > actual critical bug, and i
16 matches
Mail list logo
