On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems. He wanted to
note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
released to
* Simon Phipps:
On Nov 5, 2008, at 23:23, Michael Banck wrote:
- portmap.c
/*
@(#)portmap.c 2.3 88/08/11 4.0 RPCSRC
static char sccsid[] = @(#)portmap.c 1.32 87/08/06 Copyr 1984 Sun
Micro;
*/
This is portmap-6.0, from http://neil.brown.name/portmap/
Is this in any way related to
* Simon Phipps:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 03:52, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Many of the functions in portmap.c seem to correspond to
rpcbind (usr/src/cmd/rpcbind) in OpenSolaris:
Is it just the function prototypes that are derived, or is there
derived source defining them too?
From our portmap.c:
|
On Nov 5, 2008, at 23:23, Michael Banck wrote:
- portmap.c
/*
@(#)portmap.c 2.3 88/08/11 4.0 RPCSRC
static char sccsid[] = @(#)portmap.c 1.32 87/08/06 Copyr 1984 Sun
Micro;
*/
This is portmap-6.0, from http://neil.brown.name/portmap/
Is this in any way related to any Sun code, or is the
I'll look into doing a pull on OpenSolaris and see what matches. Does Sun have
OpenSolaris loaded into a copy of Nutch somewhere? That would be ever so useful.
- Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this in any way related to any Sun code, or is the string simply
used by the author
Try OpenGrok: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/
On Nov 18, 2008, at 01:12, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I'll look into doing a pull on OpenSolaris and see what matches.
Does Sun have OpenSolaris loaded into a copy of Nutch somewhere?
That would be ever so useful.
- Simon Phipps [EMAIL
Thanks for the input.
On Nov 18, 2008, at 03:52, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Many of the functions in portmap.c seem to correspond to
rpcbind (usr/src/cmd/rpcbind) in OpenSolaris:
Is it just the function prototypes that are derived, or is there
derived source defining them too?
The key
I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems. He wanted to
note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the time when Sun
released to the community and they couldn't have predicted that it would
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:32:35PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I'm here at ApacheCon with Simon Phipps and he said that Sun would be
delighted to help Debian resolve the RPC licensing problems. He
wanted to note that the Free Software Definition did not exist at the
time when Sun released to
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:07:07PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
latter would
- Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming Sun is the sole copyright holder of that code, he could advise
their IP laywers/whoever to relicense the code; either to the glibc
license (LGPL-1.2 or later, currently), or perhaps the BSD license. The
latter would probably be best for
- Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code is copyrighted by Sun, not some particular employee, so AFAICT
digging up who wrote it will not be necessary.
Please understand that asking Sun to relicense source is a little like asking
Debian to hurry up and release Lenny. Different
12 matches
Mail list logo
