Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h missing on amd64.

2007-01-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
reassign 403658 purelibc retitle 403658 purelibc: FTBFS: Makes use of glibc internal _IO_MTSAFE_IO. thanks > Theoretically you should not define _IO_MTSAFE_IO it is reserved for > glibc internals. That's why you get an error there, when using a NPTL libc. So, I've reassign it to purelibc, because

Processed: Re: Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h missing on amd64.

2007-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 403658 purelibc Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h missing on amd64. Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `purelibc'. > retitle 403658 purelibc: FTBFS: Makes use of glibc internal _IO_MTSAFE_IO. Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h

Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h missing on amd64.

2007-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
severity 403658 normal merge 404532 403658 thanks Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.3.6.ds1-9 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > While trying to build purelibc on amd64 I get the following error: > In file included from /usr/include/libio.h:171, > from /usr/

Bug#403658: lowlevellock.h missing on amd64.

2006-12-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.6.ds1-9 Severity: important Hi, While trying to build purelibc on amd64 I get the following error: In file included from /usr/include/libio.h:171, from /usr/include/stdio.h:72, from stdio.c:25: /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h:24:26: