On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:48:24PM +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of nscd (2.5-11) has the bogus dependency on
libc6-amd65 again:
Package: nscd
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 244
Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The latest version of nscd (2.5-11) has the bogus dependency on
libc6-amd65 again:
Package: nscd
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 244
Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
Architecture: i386
Source: glibc
Version: 2.5-11
Depends: libc6-amd64 (=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 425905 dpkg-dev,nscd
Bug#425905: nscd: should it depend on libc6-amd64 ?
Bug reassigned from package `nscd' to `dpkg-dev,nscd'.
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:17
reassign 425905 dpkg-dev,nscd
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:17:10PM +0300, Wladimir Mutel wrote:
I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686.
Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ?
It doesn't even have a dependency on libc6
Package: nscd
Version: 2.5-8
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686.
Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ?
Are there really any benefits from this, even on x86_64 CPUs ?
What is so
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:17:10PM +0300, Wladimir Mutel wrote:
I have K7 CPU. Lots of other my hosts have i686.
Why upgrade to nscd 2.5-8 should bring libc6-amd64 with itself ?
It doesn't even have a dependency on libc6 (non-amd64), so I think
this must be a bug in the build
6 matches
Mail list logo
