Bug#438179: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [PATCH] getaddrinfo(): option to not sort IPv4 addresses]

2007-08-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Please find attached the answer from upstream about this problem. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Bug#438179: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [PATCH] getaddrinfo(): option to not sort IPv4 addresses]

2007-08-20 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
I think libc is completely correct in what it's doing. The bug is in NTP. Historically, there is some ambiguity in the interpretation of multiple addresses returned by a DNS query. One possible interpretation is to consider all the addresses as equivalent, and therefore to try to sort them on

Bug#438179: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [PATCH] getaddrinfo(): option to not sort IPv4 addresses]

2007-08-20 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:15:03PM +, Kurt Roeckx wrote: The reason we have that sorting is to get consistency. I won't add such an option to disturb it. Not to sort is completely, utterly wrong since the order in which addresses are returned from the service are more or less