Ian Jackson a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno writes (Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.):
An IP which uses the same IP range as your computer, as defined by the
netmask. In short a local server which can be reached without a
gateway.
Ah. I see.
So what you mean is that it will now:
Aurelien Jarno writes (Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.):
IP on different subnet are not sorted, IP on some local subnet are
sorted by a longer common prefix with the interface address.
Err, pardon my language, but WTF ?!
What on earth is the justification for that ?
Ian.
--
Aurelien Jarno writes (Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.):
An IP which uses the same IP range as your computer, as defined by the
netmask. In short a local server which can be reached without a
gateway.
Ah. I see.
So what you mean is that it will now:
* prefer a server in the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:18:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Aurelien Jarno writes (Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.):
Upstream has committed a fix in the CVS (without telling anybody) so
that for IPv4 addresses rule 9 is only applied when source and
destination addresses are
Aurelien Jarno writes (Re: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.):
Upstream has committed a fix in the CVS (without telling anybody) so
that for IPv4 addresses rule 9 is only applied when source and
destination addresses are in the same subnet. I guess this is very close
to the wanted
5 matches
Mail list logo
