found 455603 2.9-23
thanks
The bug seems to have been inadvertently reintroduced in 2.9-23 (svn
revision 3665, to be exact). As a result, nothing on my system has a
dependency on libc6-i686 anymore.
I also agree that Recommends would be preferable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-req
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 455603 2.9-23
Bug #455603 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] Suggests or
recommends libc6-i686
There is no source info for the package 'libc6' at version '2.9-23' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.9-23'
Bug M
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Josh Triplett a écrit :
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.7-4
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Consider adding a Suggests or Recommends for libc6-i686 to libc6.
>> Suggests would help people find and install it. Recommends might
>> actually make sense, because at this point a pre-
Josh Triplett a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.7-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Consider adding a Suggests or Recommends for libc6-i686 to libc6.
> Suggests would help people find and install it. Recommends might
> actually make sense, because at this point a pre-686 system might well
> qualif
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:53:04AM +, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.7-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Consider adding a Suggests or Recommends for libc6-i686 to libc6.
> Suggests would help people find and install it. Recommends might
> actually make sense, because at this poi
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-4
Severity: wishlist
Consider adding a Suggests or Recommends for libc6-i686 to libc6.
Suggests would help people find and install it. Recommends might
actually make sense, because at this point a pre-686 system might well
qualify as an "unusual installation" per Polic
6 matches
Mail list logo
