Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Ferenc Wagner
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 14:45:21 +0200 Ferenc Wagner wrote: > xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686 from unstable doesn't boot for me > either. Should it? It actually does, I was misguided by the hvc vs xvc vs serial console flow control issues. Unfortunately qla2xxx is still broken, but that belon

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Andy Smith
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:49:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Unfortunately ldconfig will not allow the same hwconfig twice. > > > >For now I reverted it to 0 and rebooted; this has got rid of the > >warnings. I will just have to bear it in mind for

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Ferenc Wagner
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:19:49 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> Given how Xen works, a lot of people are not able to change their >> kernel. > > This is incorrect. There are now two possibilities to use the guest > supplied kernels

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread debian-bugs
Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately ldconfig will not allow the same hwconfig twice. For now I reverted it to 0 and rebooted; this has got rid of the warnings. I will just have to bear it in mind for when I can again use the Lenny kernel for this Lenny domU I suppose. That did

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Given how Xen works, a lot of people are not able to change their > > kernel. > > This is incorrect. There are now two possibilities to use the guest > supplied kern

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Andy Smith
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:56:57AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:20:12PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > Thanks Bastian. What is your best advice for a workaround since I > > can't change dom0 from the packaged Etch hypervisor and current Lenny > > kernels do not boot with

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Given how Xen works, a lot of people are not able to change their > kernel. This is incorrect. There are now two possibilities to use the guest supplied kernels and the whole bunch of enterprise distributions never really supported

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread debian-bugs
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could you try to edit /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libc6-xen.conf, and add back the line "hwcap 0 nosegneg", while keeping the line "hwcap 1 nosegneg"? If it works we should be able to support both Etch and Lenny kernels. But that would mean one more upload. Shrug.

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:20:12PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:06:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > The proposed patch has been applied. But maybe it is wrong. Waldi, could > > > you please have a loo

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:06:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The proposed patch has been applied. But maybe it is wrong. Waldi, could > > you please have a look? I have no Xen machine. > > The patch is correct. The problem is

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-14 Thread Andy Smith
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:06:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The proposed patch has been applied. But maybe it is wrong. Waldi, could > > you please have a look? I have no Xen machine. > > The patch is correct. The problem is

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The proposed patch has been applied. But maybe it is wrong. Waldi, could > you please have a look? I have no Xen machine. The patch is correct. The problem is the "wrong" capability definition in the Etch kernel. But fixing the pack

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:47:51AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Ever since updating to libc6-xen 2.7-14 I am seeing the "4gb seg fixup" > warnings: > > Oct 14 10:43:34 cacti kernel: printk: 11610 messages suppressed. > Oct 14 10:43:34 cacti kernel: 4gb seg fixup, process head (pid 5876), c

Bug#499366: "4gb seg fixup" not fixed in 2.7-14?

2008-10-14 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, Ever since updating to libc6-xen 2.7-14 I am seeing the "4gb seg fixup" warnings: Oct 14 10:43:34 cacti kernel: printk: 11610 messages suppressed. Oct 14 10:43:34 cacti kernel: 4gb seg fixup, process head (pid 5876), cs:ip 73:b7ebb33a Oct 14 10:43:38 cacti init: Trying to re-exec init Oct 1