Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2011 19:48:42 +
with message-id e1qgcdg-00065i...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:34:06 +
with message-id e1q4mso-0002uq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-0exp5
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:03:04 +
with message-id e1pz5yg-0002n1...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-0exp4
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:48:03 +
with message-id e1pujnl-00072u...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-0exp3
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:48:03 +
with message-id e1ptsvj-xx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-0exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:03:26 +
with message-id e1pmyf4-0003go...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563724: fixed in eglibc 2.13-0exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #563724,
regarding futimens() is not POSIX compliant
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
6 matches
Mail list logo