Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
merge 584778 585051 tag 584778 + fixed-upstream tag 584778 + patch thanks On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:47:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote: I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also works. no, it's not 2.11, but 2.11 glibc built --with-multi-arch. Would the glibc

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:45:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote: I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also works. no, it's not 2.11,

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it will be for later. All that said, I don't plan to disable --with-multi-arch. Aurelien, you mentioned

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it will be for later. All that said, I don't plan to disable