At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tags 86220 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't
> reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I
> think this is just a mistake on th
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tags 86220 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't
> reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I
> think this is just a mistake on th
tags 86220 + unreproducible
thanks
Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't
reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I
think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the
bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't
tags 86220 + unreproducible
thanks
Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't
reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I
think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the
bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't
4 matches
Mail list logo