Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tags 86220 + unreproducible > thanks > > Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't > reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I > think this is just a mistake on th

Re: Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-29 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:00:04 -0500, H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tags 86220 + unreproducible > thanks > > Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't > reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I > think this is just a mistake on th

Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-27 Thread H. S. Teoh
tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't

Bug#86220: Submitter can't reproduce bug

2002-12-27 Thread H. S. Teoh
tags 86220 + unreproducible thanks Should this bug be closed altogether? The submitter himself can't reproduce it, and judging from the fact that tolower() *is* being used, I think this is just a mistake on the part of the submitter. (Besides, the bug is almost 2 years old and the submitter hasn't