> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> No, that simply doesn't scale. Other packages than the one in src:glibc
AJ> depends on libc6 >= 2.26, and more and more are going to pick up this
AJ> dependency in the next months. They might also be unpacked before libc6
AJ> preinst is ran. We can't add t
On 2018-01-23 19:56, James Cloos wrote:
> AJ> Do you have a list of other packages from the glibc src that are
> AJ> upgraded before?
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc-dev-bin : Depends: libc6 (> 2.26) but 2.25-6 is installed
> libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.26-4) but 2
AJ> Do you have a list of other packages from the glibc src that are
AJ> upgraded before?
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc-dev-bin : Depends: libc6 (> 2.26) but 2.25-6 is installed
libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.26-4) but 2.25-6 is installed
libc6-i386 : Depends: libc6 (= 2
On 2018-01-23 17:57, James Cloos wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> AJ> It's exactly what the message does. It stopped the upgrade and prevented
> AJ> libc6 to be unpacked. That way your system is still usable.
>
> But that is NOT what the message does. The other debs from the gl
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> It's exactly what the message does. It stopped the upgrade and prevented
AJ> libc6 to be unpacked. That way your system is still usable.
But that is NOT what the message does. The other debs from the glibc
source are already upgraded and now everything b
On 2018-01-23 17:17, James Cloos wrote:
> > "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> AJ> This is perfectly normal that you do no get a dialog asking wether you
> AJ> want to upgrade libc6, as your kernel is too old for that.
>
> Not it is not normal. It still should have given that dialog so that
> "AJ" == Aurelien Jarno writes:
AJ> This is perfectly normal that you do no get a dialog asking wether you
AJ> want to upgrade libc6, as your kernel is too old for that.
Not it is not normal. It still should have given that dialog so that I
could skip libc and its fellows and upgrade what
On 2018-01-23 20:04, cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.26-4
> Severity: important
>
> [Reporting this from a different box.]
>
> The latest libc upgrade again breaks openvz virtuals.
>
> On kvm/xen/bare you get a dialog asking whether you want to upgrade libc.
>
> On vz you
Package: libc6
Version: 2.26-4
Severity: important
[Reporting this from a different box.]
The latest libc upgrade again breaks openvz virtuals.
On kvm/xen/bare you get a dialog asking whether you want to upgrade libc.
On vz you get a notice about the (un-upgradable) kernel version but
not the d
9 matches
Mail list logo
