-2.3.1/objdir/crypt:/home
/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/linuxthreads /home/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/gli
bc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o /home/
dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
FATAL: kernel too old
make[2]: *** [/home/dave
Check that _dl_osversion (_rtld_global._dl_osversion) is getting initialized.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/xbootparam_prot.T
FATAL: kernel too old
make[2]: *** [/home/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot
.stmp] Error 1
Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old?
I configured with
../glibc/configure --build=hppa-linux --host=hppa-linux --target=hppa-linux
--prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --disable
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:13:07PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old?
Yes. hppa-linux requires 2.4.19
Ok, I try one of the other builds but none so far have been particularly
stable on a rp2470c.
Thanks,
Dave
--
J. David Anglin
Dave,
I can build a UP 2.4.20 for the rp2470 and see how that fairs.
SMP has in fact not been especially stable for the 2.4.19 hppa releases.
That would be great. I was going to try vmlinux-2.4.20-rc1-pa7
after the gcc testsuite run that is in progress completes. I seem
to recall that
-2.3.1/objdir/crypt:/home
/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/linuxthreads /home/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/gli
bc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o /home/
dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
FATAL: kernel too old
make[2]: *** [/home/dave
Check that _dl_osversion (_rtld_global._dl_osversion) is getting initialized.
/xbootparam_prot.T
FATAL: kernel too old
make[2]: ***
[/home/dave/glibc-2.3.1-5/glibc-2.3.1/objdir/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot
.stmp] Error 1
Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old?
I configured with
../glibc/configure --build=hppa-linux --host=hppa-linux --target=hppa-linux
--prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:13:07PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old?
Yes. hppa-linux requires 2.4.19
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:13:07PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old?
Yes. hppa-linux requires 2.4.19
Ok, I try one of the other builds but none so far have been particularly
stable on a rp2470c.
Thanks,
Dave
--
J. David Anglin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:42:00PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
Ok, I try one of the other builds but none so far have been particularly
stable on a rp2470c.
Dave,
I can build a UP 2.4.20 for the rp2470 and see how that fairs.
SMP has in fact not been especially stable for the 2.4.19 hppa
Dave,
I can build a UP 2.4.20 for the rp2470 and see how that fairs.
SMP has in fact not been especially stable for the 2.4.19 hppa releases.
That would be great. I was going to try vmlinux-2.4.20-rc1-pa7
after the gcc testsuite run that is in progress completes. I seem
to recall that
12 matches
Mail list logo