On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Ryan S Arnold wrote:
> Immediately I'll probably move libdfp development to github and then
> work on glibc integration (round 2) when I have the time. The
> intricacies of the build system will need to be very closely monitored
> during migration.
(I should also note that I
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Ryan S Arnold wrote:
> Libdfp still lacks integration of the libbid backend (to make libdfp
> work on x86), and I suspect that might be a prereq for glibc
> integration. Tthe libdecnumber back end can be used (with some work)
I don't see why that should be needed, as long as
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 11:53 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Following up on discussions in another thread, here is the plan I propose
> for phasing out the separate EGLIBC source tree so that all glibc
> development for embedded systems goes directly in the main FSF glibc git
>
Following up on discussions in another thread, here is the plan I propose
for phasing out the separate EGLIBC source tree so that all glibc
development for embedded systems goes directly in the main FSF glibc git
tree.
I propose the goal that 2.19, in about six months' time, is the
4 matches
Mail list logo