I guess this is a glibc problem, but I'm not 100% sure, of course.
paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# apt-get update
E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (22 Invalid argument)
E: Unable to lock the list directory
paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# l -d /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
I've updated glibc to the ve
I guess this is a glibc problem, but I'm not 100% sure, of course.
paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# apt-get update
E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (22 Invalid argument)
E: Unable to lock the list directory
paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# l -d /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
I've updated glibc to the ve
At Sat, 4 Jan 2003 19:24:58 +0100,
Martin Schulze wrote:
> I guess this is a glibc problem, but I'm not 100% sure, of course.
>
> paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# apt-get update
> E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (22 Invalid argument)
> E: Unable to lock the list directory
> paer!joey(pt
> So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> I've added changes for the current glibc cvs as follows:
looks good to me.
if there's a common place where the kernel version information is
docum
At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> > comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> > I've added changes for the current glibc cvs as follows:
>
> looks good to me.
Than
In reference to a message from GOTO Masanori, dated Jan 06:
> At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
> Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> > > comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> > > I've added chan
At Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:27:02 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> In reference to a message from GOTO Masanori, dated Jan 06:
> > At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
> > Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> > > > comparing kernel version
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Oops! I'm sorry, I fixed as follows:
>
> --- libc/DEBIAN/preinst 6 Jan 2003 13:51:53 - 1.5
> +++ libc/DEBIAN/preinst 7 Jan 2003 13:27:02 -
> @@ -115,10 +115,11 @@
> fi
> # parisc64 boxes require latest fixes in the kernel 2.4.19-pa17 or later
>
> If that is the so called solution, could somebody please do something
> I requested a while ago:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00065.html
>
> tausq: *hint* *hint*
>
> Regards,
>
> Joey
Joey,
I spoke with you about this, glibc requires that a min_ke
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > If that is the so called solution, could somebody please do something
> > I requested a while ago:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00065.html
> >
> > tausq: *hint* *hint*
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Joey
>
> Joey,
>
> I spoke
> Oops! I'm sorry, I fixed as follows:
> +# Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`uname -r`-64".
[...]
> - if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-pa17
> + if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-64
> then
> echo WARNING: This v
At Tue, 7 Jan 2003 07:00:52 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> > Oops! I'm sorry, I fixed as follows:
> > +# Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`uname -r`-64".
> [...]
> > - if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-pa17
> > + if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver"
Gotom,
A few minor glitches:
> # parisc64 boxes require latest fixes in the kernel 2.4.19-pa17 or later
> # (in 2.4.x), 2.5.53-pa3 or later (in 2.5.x), to function properly.
> # Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`uname -r`-64".
> if [ "$realarch" = parisc64 ]
> then
At Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:30:01 -0500,
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> A few minor glitches:
>
> > # parisc64 boxes require latest fixes in the kernel 2.4.19-pa17 or later
> > # (in 2.4.x), 2.5.53-pa3 or later (in 2.5.x), to function properly.
> > # Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`
At Sat, 4 Jan 2003 19:24:58 +0100,
Martin Schulze wrote:
> I guess this is a glibc problem, but I'm not 100% sure, of course.
>
> paer!joey(pts/9):/tmp# apt-get update
> E: Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (22 Invalid argument)
> E: Unable to lock the list directory
> paer!joey(pt
> So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> I've added changes for the current glibc cvs as follows:
looks good to me.
if there's a common place where the kernel version information is
docum
At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> > comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> > I've added changes for the current glibc cvs as follows:
>
> looks good to me.
Than
In reference to a message from GOTO Masanori, dated Jan 06:
> At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
> Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's mail,
> > > comparing kernel version with 2.4.19-pa17 in libc6 preinst is needed.
> > > I've added chan
At Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:27:02 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> In reference to a message from GOTO Masanori, dated Jan 06:
> > At Sun, 5 Jan 2003 23:34:01 -0800,
> > Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > > So fixing either glibc or libc6 preinst is needed. From Randolph's
> > > > mail,
> > > > comparing kerne
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Oops! I'm sorry, I fixed as follows:
>
> --- libc/DEBIAN/preinst 6 Jan 2003 13:51:53 - 1.5
> +++ libc/DEBIAN/preinst 7 Jan 2003 13:27:02 -
> @@ -115,10 +115,11 @@
> fi
> # parisc64 boxes require latest fixes in the kernel 2.4.19-pa17 or later
>
> Oops! I'm sorry, I fixed as follows:
> +# Note that parisc64 kernel version scheme is "`uname -r`-64".
[...]
> - if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-pa17
> + if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.19-64
> then
> echo WARNING: This v
> If that is the so called solution, could somebody please do something
> I requested a while ago:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00065.html
>
> tausq: *hint* *hint*
>
> Regards,
>
> Joey
Joey,
I spoke with you about this, glibc requires that a min_ke
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > If that is the so called solution, could somebody please do something
> > I requested a while ago:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200212/msg00065.html
> >
> > tausq: *hint* *hint*
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Joey
>
> Joey,
>
> I spoke
23 matches
Mail list logo