Hi!
> Mmmm.. It's probably safest for us to not do this until Sarge+1. Won't
> having NGROUPS set too high for older kernels cause us grief?
I just asked because compiling glibc takes quite a long time and I have to
watch out not to mix versions up...
I use glibc compiled with kernel headers f
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 14:31, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> Beginning with kernel 2.6.4 the NGROUPS-limit is by default 65K. Are there
> any
> plans to use this feature in Debian/glibc?
Mmmm.. It's probably safest for us to not do this until Sarge+1. Won't
having NGROUPS set too high for older kernel
Hi!
> Mmmm.. It's probably safest for us to not do this until Sarge+1. Won't
> having NGROUPS set too high for older kernels cause us grief?
I just asked because compiling glibc takes quite a long time and I have to
watch out not to mix versions up...
I use glibc compiled with kernel headers f
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 14:31, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> Beginning with kernel 2.6.4 the NGROUPS-limit is by default 65K. Are there any
> plans to use this feature in Debian/glibc?
Mmmm.. It's probably safest for us to not do this until Sarge+1. Won't
having NGROUPS set too high for older kernels c
Hi!
Beginning with kernel 2.6.4 the NGROUPS-limit is by default 65K. Are there any
plans to use this feature in Debian/glibc?
best regards,
Adi Kriegisch
Hi!
Beginning with kernel 2.6.4 the NGROUPS-limit is by default 65K. Are there any
plans to use this feature in Debian/glibc?
best regards,
Adi Kriegisch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
