Re: Should libc6-dev conflict against binutils in experimental?

2007-07-13 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:01:31PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:19:16AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version > > > in experimental. Maybe it should be added too? > > > > That's really not possible, t

Re: Should libc6-dev conflict against binutils in experimental?

2007-07-13 Thread Touko Korpela
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:19:16AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version > > in experimental. Maybe it should be added too? > > That's really not possible, the version in experimental is higher (from > the debian version point of

Re: Should libc6-dev conflict against binutils in experimental?

2007-07-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Touko Korpela a écrit : > Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version > in experimental. Maybe it should be added too? > That's really not possible, the version in experimental is higher (from the debian version point of view) than the version in unstable. If we do th

Should libc6-dev conflict against binutils in experimental?

2007-07-12 Thread Touko Korpela
Current conflicts binutils (<< 2.17cvs20070426-1) doesn't match version in experimental. Maybe it should be added too? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]