Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-26 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 12:06:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Please note that this software will, at some point in the future, fail > > to compile again. All this has done is buy some time. Please make sure > > your software fixes the broken usage of "extern int errno;" and replaces > > i

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-26 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 12:06:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Please note that this software will, at some point in the future, fail > > to compile again. All this has done is buy some time. Please make sure > > your software fixes the broken usage of "extern int errno;" and replaces > > i

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Jeff Bailey wrote: > Please note that this software will, at some point in the future, fail > to compile again. All this has done is buy some time. Please make sure > your software fixes the broken usage of "extern int errno;" and replaces > it with proper uses of the header. Err? Did the beha

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Jeff Bailey wrote: > Please note that this software will, at some point in the future, fail > to compile again. All this has done is buy some time. Please make sure > your software fixes the broken usage of "extern int errno;" and replaces > it with proper uses of the header. Err? Did the beha

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 02:15:24PM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > >Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > >that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? > I've tested glibc-2.3.1-8 and it now allow software which previously > failed to comp

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Reid Sutherland wrote: Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? I've tested glibc-2.3.1-8 and it now allow software which previously failed to compile, to actualyl compile without issue. Also, binary

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 02:15:24PM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > >Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > >that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? > I've tested glibc-2.3.1-8 and it now allow software which previously > failed to comp

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Reid Sutherland wrote: Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? I've tested glibc-2.3.1-8 and it now allow software which previously failed to compile, to actualyl compile without issue. Also, binar

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Jeff Bailey wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? As a temporary fix, consider downgrading to glibc 2.3.1-5. -8 will contain

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? As a temporary fix, consider downgrading to glibc 2.3.1-5. -8 will contain the fix. I'm

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? > > (I'd like to turn my mail server back on soon :) > > Thanks, and happy holidays! It w

Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? (I'd like to turn my mail server back on soon :) Thanks, and happy holidays! -reid

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Jeff Bailey wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? As a temporary fix, consider downgrading to glibc 2.3.1-5. -8 will con

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? As a temporary fix, consider downgrading to glibc 2.3.1-5. -8 will contain the fix. I'm

Re: Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 11:33:17AM -0500, Reid Sutherland wrote: > Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug > that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? > > (I'd like to turn my mail server back on soon :) > > Thanks, and happy holidays! It w

Status of glibc-2.3.1-{6,7}

2002-12-24 Thread Reid Sutherland
Is there any fix available for the current glibc to fix the 'errno' bug that's associated with various software (qmail, ucspi-tcp, etc)? (I'd like to turn my mail server back on soon :) Thanks, and happy holidays! -reid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr